Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
14.5% regression in blink_perf.pywebsocket at 414092:414103 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Aug 26 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9003254460130364864
,
Aug 26 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@414091 32.7278 1.35073 18 good chromium@414103 32.2167 1.24629 18 bad Bisect job ran on: linux_perf_bisect Bug ID: 641349 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.pywebsocket Test Metric: XHR-receive-arraybuffer-worker-async-verify/XHR-receive-arraybuffer-worker-async-verify Relative Change: 4.40% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/linux_perf_bisect/builds/6670 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9003254460130364864 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5776391035944960 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Aug 30 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9002893892734944368
,
Aug 30 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@414103 34.6222 1.63115 18 good chromium@414119 34.2222 1.4355 18 bad Bisect job ran on: linux_perf_bisect Bug ID: 641349 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.pywebsocket Test Metric: XHR-receive-arraybuffer-worker-async-verify/XHR-receive-arraybuffer-worker-async-verify Relative Change: 1.38% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/linux_perf_bisect/builds/6679 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9002893892734944368 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5333309867950080 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Sep 23 2016
Bisects can't reproduce. |
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by mustaq@chromium.org
, Aug 26 2016