New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 641086 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner: ----
Closed: May 2017
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

21.1% regression in blink_perf.pywebsocket at 414065:414077

Project Member Reported by pras...@chromium.org, Aug 25 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=641086

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgvuKxuAkM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

linux-release
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Aug 25 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@414064  54.3389  3.40002  18  good
chromium@414077  55.7722  4.09803  18  bad

Bisect job ran on: linux_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 641086

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.pywebsocket
Test Metric: WebSocket-receive-worker-async-verify/WebSocket-receive-worker-async-verify
Relative Change: 2.16%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/linux_perf_bisect/builds/6667
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9003330699742437648


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5814244730208256

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@414064  53.8556  2.78129  18  good
chromium@414077  55.45    2.46916  18  bad

Bisect job ran on: linux_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 641086

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.pywebsocket
Test Metric: WebSocket-receive-worker-async-verify/WebSocket-receive-worker-async-verify
Relative Change: 0.14%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/linux_perf_bisect/builds/6705
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9001964254941534720


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5872271036514304

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Trying a wider bisect.
Owner: ----

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@414051  55.9778  2.84037  18  good
chromium@414077  57.9778  7.43138  18  bad

Bisect job ran on: linux_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 641086

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.pywebsocket
Test Metric: WebSocket-receive-worker-async-verify/WebSocket-receive-worker-async-verify
Relative Change: 0.29%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/linux_perf_bisect/builds/6753
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999524908737195872


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5793281378615296

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Status: Untriaged (was: Assigned)
Status: WontFix (was: Untriaged)
Old, and graphs aren't showing up.
Marking WontFix.

Sign in to add a comment