Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
51% regression in tracing.tracing_with_debug_overhead at 412302:412338 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Aug 22 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9003641162464416688
,
Aug 22 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@412301 13836.9 265.125 8 good chromium@412306 13788.4 114.071 5 good chromium@412307 21008.4 552.585 5 bad chromium@412308 20685.4 936.49 5 bad chromium@412309 21044.2 553.932 5 bad chromium@412311 20693.4 434.141 5 bad chromium@412320 21430.0 1392.06 5 bad chromium@412338 19217.0 3464.71 8 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus7_perf_bisect Bug ID: 639773 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests tracing.tracing_with_debug_overhead Test Metric: Max number of events per second/Max number of events per second Relative Change: 27.14% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus7_perf_bisect/builds/3235 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9003641162464416688 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5286064248324096 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Aug 22 2016
Marking as fixed :- should have marked as ignore rather opening a bug. The regression appears to be a revert to old performance figures after temporary boost. |
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by oth@chromium.org
, Aug 22 2016