Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
22.7% regression in memory.blink_memory_mobile at 413195:413228 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Aug 21 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9003677172978530912
,
Aug 21 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9003677165594955600
,
Aug 22 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@413194 6446008 244924 17 good chromium@413228 6528650 56764.8 18 bad Bisect job ran on: android_s5_perf_bisect Bug ID: 639696 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests memory.blink_memory_mobile Test Metric: memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:partition_alloc:effective_size_avg/memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:partition_alloc:effective_size_avg Relative Change: 2.53% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_s5_perf_bisect/builds/932 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9003677165594955600 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5265653489991680 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Aug 22 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@413194 6489315 97075.3 17 good chromium@413228 6490971 82329.9 17 bad Bisect job ran on: android_s5_perf_bisect Bug ID: 639696 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests memory.blink_memory_mobile Test Metric: memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:partition_alloc:effective_size_avg/memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:partition_alloc:effective_size_avg Relative Change: 0.53% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_s5_perf_bisect/builds/931 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9003677172978530912 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5588672477396992 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Nov 18 2016
,
Apr 11 2017
|
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by bashi@chromium.org
, Aug 21 2016