Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
5.9% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 404896:404951 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Aug 19 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9003876039271021184
,
Aug 20 2016
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author vollick@chromium.org === Hi vollick@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL below as possibly causing a regression. Please have a look at this info and see whether your CL be related. ===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : Use node() when generating element id's Author : vollick Commit description: The current code followed the lead of crrev.com/279553002 and incorrectly used generatingNode, which lead to discrepancies when animating pseudo elements. It seems that node() is the correct choice, both here and in the CL I referenced. BUG= 626571 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2141743002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#404921} Commit : 10b3fec07dfda5c362f1fc27a314468541c72ae0 Date : Wed Jul 13 02:43:18 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@404895 6651676 0.0 5 good chromium@404909 6651676 0.0 5 good chromium@404916 6651676 0.0 5 good chromium@404920 6651676 0.0 5 good chromium@404921 7044892 0.0 5 bad <-- chromium@404922 7044892 0.0 5 bad chromium@404923 7044892 0.0 5 bad chromium@404951 7044892 0.0 5 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus9_perf_bisect Bug ID: 639378 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_mobile Test Metric: load_media-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:skia:effective_size_avg/load_media_flickr Relative Change: 5.91% Score: 99.9 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus9_perf_bisect/builds/2036 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9003876039271021184 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6405378762342400 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Aug 30 2016
,
Aug 31 2016
Appears to have recovered. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by petrcermak@chromium.org
, Aug 19 2016