Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
16.4% regression in media.android.tough_video_cases cpu_utilization at 411980:412026 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionBounced up but has since recovered. Filing bug/bisect just out of curiosity. Range has some overlap with inverse graphs (temporarily down, then jumped back up) for time-to-play metric ( Issue 638681 )
,
Aug 17 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004055447558619632
,
Aug 18 2016
,
Aug 18 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@411979 6.70343 0.178159 11 good chromium@412026 6.89721 0.1003 8 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Bug ID: 638687 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests media.android.tough_video_cases Test Metric: cpu_utilization/crowd.wav_browser Relative Change: 3.11% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/4009 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004055447558619632 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5873640134934528 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Aug 18 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9003984100584467216
,
Aug 18 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@411979 6.70343 0.178159 11 good chromium@412026 6.89721 0.1003 8 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Bug ID: 638687 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests media.android.tough_video_cases Test Metric: cpu_utilization/crowd.wav_browser Relative Change: 3.11% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/4009 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004055447558619632 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5873640134934528 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Aug 18 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9003959808039691200
,
Aug 18 2016
Good revision doesn't have the expected lower mean (should be ~5.25 good vs 6.25 bad). I'm re-doing bisect with bigger range.
,
Aug 19 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@411971 6.46416 0.180203 14 good chromium@412130 6.53797 0.209319 12 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Bug ID: 638687 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests media.android.tough_video_cases Test Metric: cpu_utilization/crowd.wav_browser Relative Change: 2.80% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/4014 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9003959808039691200 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5858510307328000 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Aug 19 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9003891046079530624
,
Aug 19 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@411979 6.60358 0.161099 14 good chromium@412026 6.59251 0.190153 12 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Bug ID: 638687 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests media.android.tough_video_cases Test Metric: cpu_utilization/crowd.wav_browser Relative Change: 0.16% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/4012 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004055447558619632 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5873640134934528 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Aug 19 2016
Giving up - bisects aren't reproducing results from the graph. The graph had already recovered at the time I ran the bisects, so whatever the issue was seems to be resolved... |
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by chcunningham@google.com
, Aug 17 2016