Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
36.2% regression in memory.long_running_idle_gmail_background_tbmv2 at 411586:411607 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Aug 15 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004219925723777520
,
Aug 16 2016
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author hpayer@chromium.org === Hi hpayer@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL below as possibly causing a regression. Please have a look at this info and see whether your CL be related. ===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : Fix wrong state of IsolateInBackgroundNotification and IsolateInForegroundNotification. Author : hpayer Commit description: BUG= chromium:636368 , chromium:635965 , chromium:634900 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2245483004 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#38598} Commit : b992a8e1899091e3c180a050c1a63fa1e29886d5 Date : Fri Aug 12 08:13:56 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@411585 0.837151 0.137361 5 good chromium@411591 0.828167 0.10309 8 good chromium@411592 0.820026 0.100996 8 good chromium@411592,v8@64658b6c28 0.81923 0.0516068 5 good chromium@411592,v8@e6e32315cc 0.840817 0.0583967 5 good chromium@411592,v8@b992a8e189 1.05432 0.0456413 5 bad <-- chromium@411593 1.11012 0.163434 8 bad chromium@411594 1.11615 0.157347 5 bad chromium@411596 1.09812 0.100134 5 bad chromium@411607 1.06523 0.0649234 5 bad Bisect job ran on: winx64nvidia_perf_bisect Bug ID: 638006 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests memory.long_running_idle_gmail_background_tbmv2 Test Metric: v8-gc-total_avg/v8-gc-total_avg Relative Change: 27.25% Score: 99.9 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64nvidia_perf_bisect/builds/1806 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004219925723777520 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5869450260119552 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Aug 16 2016
,
Aug 16 2016
Issue 638008 has been merged into this issue.
,
Aug 16 2016
Issue 638009 has been merged into this issue.
,
Aug 19 2016
This CL fixed a bug and restored the original score, c.f. all graphs went back up to where they were before. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by benjhayden@chromium.org
, Aug 15 2016