Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
10.7%-13.7% regression in top_10_mobile_memory at 410297:410319 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Aug 10 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004710046276633024
,
Aug 10 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@410308 2078859 23494.3 12 good chromium@410310 2073994 32231.1 12 bad Bisect job ran on: android_s5_perf_bisect Bug ID: 636355 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests top_10_mobile_memory Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:allocated_objects_size_avg/http___m.intl.taobao.com_group-purchase.html Relative Change: 0.23% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_s5_perf_bisect/builds/908 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004710046276633024 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6340927963004928 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Aug 10 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004688908429215680
,
Aug 10 2016
Kicked off bisect on the Windows 10 bot
,
Aug 10 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@410306 8790510 353187 18 good chromium@410336 9051680 446108 18 bad Bisect job ran on: winx64_10_perf_bisect Bug ID: 636355 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests top_10_mobile_memory Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/http___m.intl.taobao.com_group-purchase.html Relative Change: 2.00% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64_10_perf_bisect/builds/653 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004688908429215680 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5895731383107584 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Aug 15 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004255018261697312
,
Aug 15 2016
Re-kicked bisect on the Windows bot with a wider range
,
Aug 15 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@410308 8826874 205372 18 good chromium@410332 9047193 371683 18 bad Bisect job ran on: win_x64_perf_bisect Bug ID: 636355 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests top_10_mobile_memory Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/http___m.intl.taobao.com_group-purchase.html Relative Change: 3.65% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_x64_perf_bisect/builds/1400 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004255018261697312 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5861143793369088 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Aug 25 2016
Looks like the v8 roll: https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+log/fbcbbfc7..743b9df1
,
Oct 3 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999816601314906512
,
Oct 3 2016
Trying another bisect to see if we can get into the v8 roll. 3 of the tests are no longer running so it's only the first graph anymore which is unfortunately also pretty noisy. https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8999816601314906512
,
Oct 3 2016
Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_s5_perf_bisect/builds/1056 Failure reason: the build has failed. Additional errors: The metric was not found in the test output. Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.
,
Oct 6 2016
perf sheriff fixit: unsetting owners of bugs owned by sheriffs to clarify the sheriffing rotation triages the bugs.
,
Nov 22 2016
,
Nov 22 2016
Closing as we do not have S5s to verify this regression.
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982576088414906304 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by pmeenan@chromium.org
, Aug 10 2016