Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
33.1% regression in media.android.tough_video_cases at 410310:410322 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Aug 9 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004765506624499696
,
Aug 10 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@410309 557.304 52.7336 12 good chromium@410322 577.952 63.5247 18 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus7_perf_bisect Bug ID: 636136 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests media.android.tough_video_cases Test Metric: time_to_play/video.html?src_crowd1080_vp9.webm_canvas_true Relative Change: 2.38% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus7_perf_bisect/builds/3177 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004765506624499696 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6415424439189504 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Aug 10 2016
i didn't associate this with the regression correctly when i filed it. there's some other bug that does catch the regression, but i don't know which one to merge into. |
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by liber...@chromium.org
, Aug 9 2016