Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
12.2%-22.9% regression in blink_perf.parser at 410309:410329 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Aug 9 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004794303904462432
,
Aug 9 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@410316 283.455 3.45456 5 good chromium@410317 250.131 2.43001 5 bad chromium@410318 252.762 1.68316 5 bad chromium@410319 255.202 3.49358 5 bad chromium@410322 254.833 3.15882 5 bad Bisect job ran on: linux_perf_bisect Bug ID: 635938 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.parser Test Metric: iframe-append-remove/iframe-append-remove Relative Change: 10.10% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/linux_perf_bisect/builds/6630 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004794303904462432 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5290389431386112 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Aug 9 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004786028390946656
,
Aug 9 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@410316 283.455 3.45456 5 good chromium@410317 250.131 2.43001 5 bad chromium@410318 252.762 1.68316 5 bad chromium@410319 255.202 3.49358 5 bad chromium@410322 254.833 3.15882 5 bad Bisect job ran on: linux_perf_bisect Bug ID: 635938 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.parser Test Metric: iframe-append-remove/iframe-append-remove Relative Change: 10.10% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/linux_perf_bisect/builds/6630 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004794303904462432 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5290389431386112 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Aug 10 2016
,
Aug 10 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004693416893248368
,
Aug 11 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : Reland of [api] Clean up scopes and precheck instantiations cache (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2216903003/ ) Author : cbruni Commit description: Reason for revert: asan failures are caused by a flaky stack-verflow (see https://codereview.chromium.org/2218033002 for a fix). Original issue's description: > Revert of [api] Clean up scopes and precheck instantiations cache (patchset #3 id:40001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2206773003/ ) > > Reason for revert: > [Sheriff] Leads to mac asan failures: > https://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Mac64%20ASAN/builds/7835 > > Original issue's description: > > [api] Clean up scopes and precheck instantiations cache > > > > Make sure all the scopes used in api-natives.cc have inlineable constructors > > and destructors. Additionally directly precheck the instantiations cache before > > trying to enter the InvokeScope which sets the save_context. > > > > BUG=chromium:630217 > > > > Committed: https://crrev.com/a2496b942cad524f0f3144b107936eaa9a7c9fd5 > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#38346} > > TBR=yangguo@chromium.org,cbruni@chromium.org > # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago. > NOPRESUBMIT=true > NOTREECHECKS=true > NOTRY=true > BUG=chromium:630217 > > Committed: https://crrev.com/e1b5cb43a9b90546ff5d6cea89ba17c485e842fb > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#38356} TBR=yangguo@chromium.org,machenbach@chromium.org # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago. NOPRESUBMIT=true NOTREECHECKS=true NOTRY=true BUG=chromium:630217 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2217353002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#38401} Commit : 56c8814c0bfca2f4993a4f23537aed1ac4363a6f Date : Fri Aug 05 20:24:16 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@410316 35.5836 0.220743 5 good chromium@410316,v8@6b2d24fe8f 35.6388 0.276124 5 good chromium@410316,v8@4943f72272 36.603 0.603292 5 good chromium@410316,v8@56c8814c0b 40.0726 0.750565 5 bad <-- chromium@410317 40.373 0.7442 5 bad chromium@410318 40.6614 0.655703 5 bad chromium@410319 40.5778 0.537524 5 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Bug ID: 635938 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.layout Test Metric: Shapes_MultipleShapes/Shapes_MultipleShapes Relative Change: 14.04% Score: 99.9 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/493 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004794303904462432 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5290389431386112 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by rmcilroy@chromium.org
, Aug 9 2016