New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 635920 link

Starred by 0 users

Issue metadata

Status: Archived
Owner: ----
Closed: May 2018
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: Android
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression

Blocked on:
issue 636785



Sign in to add a comment

6.3%-44.1% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 410424:410480

Project Member Reported by petrcermak@chromium.org, Aug 9 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Aug 10 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean      Std Dev  N  Good?
chromium@410423  16222720  3208800  8  good
chromium@410480  14673920  3213854  8  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus6_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 635920

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_mobile
Test Metric: load_media-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:java_heap:private_dirty_size_avg/load_media_9gag
Relative Change: 15.46%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus6_perf_bisect/builds/2445
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004795929232872672


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5281542872498176

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Aug 11 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean      Std Dev  N  Good?
chromium@410056  14658048  3216971  8  good
chromium@410597  15467520  3272208  8  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus6_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 635920

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_mobile
Test Metric: load_media-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:java_heap:private_dirty_size_avg/load_media_9gag
Relative Change: 0.07%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus6_perf_bisect/builds/2453
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004712314808435360


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5227724919013376

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Aug 11 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean      Std Dev  N  Good?
chromium@409750  12907008  69042.2  8  good
chromium@410615  16993280  2855149  8  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus6_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 635920

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_mobile
Test Metric: load_media-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:java_heap:private_dirty_size_avg/load_media_9gag
Relative Change: 34.35%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus6_perf_bisect/builds/2457
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004635697374694384


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5861303059480576

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Blockedon: 636785
It looks like the regression is just noise, but the noise was introduced somewhere between r409750 (#7, low standard deviation) and r410056 (#5, high standard deviation).
Labels: SystemHealth-Sheriff
Cc: primiano@chromium.org perezju@chromium.org hjd@chromium.org
Owner: ----
Status: Available (was: Assigned)
Labels: Performance
Labels: -Performance Performance-Memory OS-Android
This has been accounted for on a macro scale and could be closed as wontfix.
Labels: -Performance Performance-Memory OS-Android
This has been accounted for on a macro scale and could be closed as wontfix.
Project Member

Comment 14 by sheriffbot@chromium.org, May 2 2018

Labels: Hotlist-Recharge-Cold
Status: Untriaged (was: Available)
This issue has been Available for over a year. If it's no longer important or seems unlikely to be fixed, please consider closing it out. If it is important, please re-triage the issue.

Sorry for the inconvenience if the bug really should have been left as Available.

For more details visit https://www.chromium.org/issue-tracking/autotriage - Your friendly Sheriffbot
Status: Archived (was: Untriaged)
Obsolete perf regression alert with more than one year of inactivity.

Sign in to add a comment