New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 635512 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner:
Closed: Aug 2017
Cc:
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression

Blocked on:
issue 666328



Sign in to add a comment

1.8%-100% regression in smoothness.simple_mobile_sites at 409855:410037

Project Member Reported by rmcilroy@chromium.org, Aug 8 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
Cc: dcasta...@chromium.org
dcastagna@ the CL "cc: Add a flag to draw green borders on GL composited quads." is in this range, could it have caused this regression?
Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/3945
Failure reason: the build has failed.
Additional errors:
The metric was not found in the test output.
Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.

Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/3945
Failure reason: the build has failed.
Additional errors:
The metric was not found in the test output.
Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.

rmcilroy@: I doubt that's the cause. crrev.com/2198573002 shouldn't affect performance at all unless that flag is passed to chrome.

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev    N   Good?
chromium@409892  16.7983  0.032562   18  good
chromium@409910  16.795   0.0266608  18  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus9_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 635512

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests smoothness.simple_mobile_sites
Test Metric: frame_times/frame_times
Relative Change: 0.07%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus9_perf_bisect/builds/2001
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004815794283287664


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5291413579759616

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 11 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Aug 10 2016

Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus6_perf_bisect/builds/2448
Failure reason: the build has failed.
Additional errors:
The metric was not found in the test output.
Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.

Project Member

Comment 14 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Aug 12 2016

Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/3985
Failure reason: the build has failed.
Additional errors:
The metric was not found in the test output.
Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.

Project Member

Comment 15 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Aug 12 2016

Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus7_perf_bisect/builds/3202
Failure reason: the build has failed.
Additional errors:
The metric was not found in the test output.
Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.

Project Member

Comment 18 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Aug 12 2016

Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/3985
Failure reason: the build has failed.
Additional errors:
The metric was not found in the test output.
Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.

Project Member

Comment 19 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Aug 12 2016

Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus7_perf_bisect/builds/3202
Failure reason: the build has failed.
Additional errors:
The metric was not found in the test output.
Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.

Project Member

Comment 22 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Aug 13 2016

Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus6_perf_bisect/builds/2464
Failure reason: the build has failed.
Additional errors:
The metric was not found in the test output.
Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.

Project Member

Comment 23 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Aug 13 2016

Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus6_perf_bisect/builds/2465
Failure reason: the build has failed.
Additional errors:
The metric was not found in the test output.
Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.

Project Member

Comment 25 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Aug 17 2016

Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/3998
Failure reason: the build has failed.
Additional errors:
The metric was not found in the test output.
Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.

Project Member

Comment 27 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Aug 17 2016

Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/3998
Failure reason: the build has failed.
Additional errors:
The metric was not found in the test output.
Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.

Project Member

Comment 29 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Aug 17 2016

Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus6_perf_bisect/builds/2448
Failure reason: the build has failed.
Additional errors:
The metric was not found in the test output.
Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.

Project Member

Comment 31 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Aug 18 2016

Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus6_perf_bisect/builds/2488
Failure reason: the build has failed.
Additional errors:
The metric was not found in the test output.
Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.

Project Member

Comment 33 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Aug 20 2016

Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus6_perf_bisect/builds/2464
Failure reason: the build has failed.
Additional errors:
The metric was not found in the test output.
Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.

Labels: BadBisect
Owner: robert...@chromium.org
Assigned to myself for investigation of repeated failed bisects.
Ping Roberto, any update on your investigation?
Perf sheriff ping
Project Member

Comment 38 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Oct 20 2016

Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus7_perf_bisect/builds/3419
Failure reason: the build has failed.
Additional errors:
The metric was not found in the test output.
Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.

Project Member

Comment 40 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Nov 17 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: failed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because Step('Compare samples') failed with return_code 1
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean  Std Dev  N  Good?
chromium@409854  N/A   N/A      0  good
chromium@409910  N/A   N/A      0  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus6_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 635512

Test Command: src/build/android/test_runner.py gtest --release -s cc_perftests --verbose
Test Metric: StructTraits deserialization/num runs in 2 seconds: DelegatedFrame_ManyQuads_100000_100000
Relative Change: None

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus6_perf_bisect/builds/2762
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8995785378225766160


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6441800145829888

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Blockedon: 666328
Owner: ----
Status: Untriaged (was: Assigned)
Owner: weiliangc@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Untriaged)
weiliangc@, it appears that the majority of these "regressions" are due to an increase in:

StructTraits deserialization / num runs in 2 seconds: *

An increase here feels like a good thing (more runs = faster runs = better?). Is it possible that the monitoring config for this perftest is just set up wrong and we need to say "higher is better"?



=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found but unable to continue

Bisect was stopped because a commit couldn't be classified as either
good or bad.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus7_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : smoothness.simple_mobile_sites
  Metric       : frame_times/frame_times


To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests smoothness.simple_mobile_sites

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977337033689490208

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5320429440335872


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!

=== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===
Perf regression found but unable to continue

Bisect was stopped because a commit couldn't be classified as either
good or bad.


Bisect Details
  Configuration: android_nexus7_perf_bisect
  Benchmark    : smoothness.simple_mobile_sites
  Metric       : frame_times/frame_times


To Run This Test
  src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --pageset-repeat=1 --also-run-disabled-tests smoothness.simple_mobile_sites

Debug Info
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8977332757341040992

Is this bisect wrong?
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5320429440335872


| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Speed>Bisection.  Thank you!
Status: WontFix (was: Assigned)
WontFix-ing because these metrics dont' exist anymore.

Sign in to add a comment