Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.8%-6% regression in smoothness.tough_path_rendering_cases at 409237:409321 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Aug 5 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005142134335400064
,
Aug 5 2016
,
Aug 6 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : Raster display item lists via a visual rect RTree. Author : wkorman Commit description: Rather than caching and playing back an entire SkPicture when rastering a display item list for a particular playback rect, instead retain display items and query them via an RTree of their visual rects to find and raster only what's needed. Display item lists no longer support the notion of a bounding "layer rect" with mutable origin. DisplayItemListSettings proto is obsolete after this change as it's comprised solely of one field to allow switching whether to use the aforementioned now-deleted cached SkPicture code path. It will be deleted in a subsequent patch. BUG= 529938 TBR=sadrul CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=master.tryserver.blink:linux_precise_blink_rel Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1484163002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#409291} Commit : ccb9e13712b1632b889960d1d85d556c0139fd51 Date : Tue Aug 02 20:08:52 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@409282 31.1551 0.150662 5 good chromium@409290 31.1388 0.182684 5 good chromium@409291 32.3356 0.316151 5 bad <-- chromium@409292 32.3312 0.191911 5 bad chromium@409294 32.2845 0.169791 5 bad chromium@409298 32.3134 0.1867 5 bad chromium@409309 32.2654 0.0904796 5 bad Bisect job ran on: winx64ati_perf_bisect Bug ID: 635027 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests smoothness.gpu_rasterization.tough_path_rendering_cases Test Metric: frame_times/frame_times Relative Change: 3.56% Score: 99.9 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64ati_perf_bisect/builds/1492 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005142134335400064 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5215773333651456 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by sullivan@chromium.org
, Aug 5 2016