New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 634401 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Duplicate
Merged: issue 634119
Owner:
Last visit > 30 days ago
Closed: Aug 2016
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

1.3% regression in system_health.memory_desktop at 409332:409391

Project Member Reported by petrcermak@chromium.org, Aug 4 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=634401

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgpoeBsgkM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win7-gpu-nvidia

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: failed


===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean      Std Dev  N  Good?
chromium@409331  22298153  49208.7  5  good
chromium@409363  22334680  29051.2  8  good
chromium@409370  22343115  30930.1  5  good
chromium@409373  22278687  53701.9  5  good
chromium@409376  22495316  50472.5  8  bad
chromium@409391  22503505  14201.8  5  bad

Bisect job ran on: winx64nvidia_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 634401

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_desktop
Test Metric: load_games-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:winheap:effective_size_avg/load_games_bubbles
Relative Change: 0.92%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64nvidia_perf_bisect/builds/1785
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005236628508929328


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5814839130193920

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: failed


===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean      Std Dev  N  Good?
chromium@409331  22298153  49208.7  5  good
chromium@409363  22334680  29051.2  8  good
chromium@409370  22343115  30930.1  5  good
chromium@409373  22278687  53701.9  5  good
chromium@409376  22495316  50472.5  8  bad
chromium@409391  22503505  14201.8  5  bad

Bisect job ran on: winx64nvidia_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 634401

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_desktop
Test Metric: load_games-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:winheap:effective_size_avg/load_games_bubbles
Relative Change: 0.92%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64nvidia_perf_bisect/builds/1785
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005236628508929328


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5814839130193920

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Mergedinto: 634119
Status: Duplicate (was: Assigned)

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


===== SUSPECTED CL(s) =====
Subject : Update vsync override in PostSubBuffers.
Author  : jbauman
Commit description:
  
This was only happening in SwapBuffers, so the vsync override could
become stale if only PostSubBuffers were happening.

BUG= 632785 

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2188063002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#409376}
Commit  : cb571e2230c90eec7d7c498f6dfd293eaa350001
Date    : Tue Aug 02 23:22:01 2016


===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean      Std Dev  N  Good?
chromium@409373  22283785  77542.5  5  good
chromium@409375  22273141  19955.1  5  good
chromium@409376  22506717  17925.6  5  bad    <--

Bisect job ran on: winx64nvidia_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 634401

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_desktop
Test Metric: load_games-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:winheap:effective_size_avg/load_games_bubbles
Relative Change: 1.00%
Score: 99.5

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64nvidia_perf_bisect/builds/1787
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005166281983831136


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5826903693328384

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Labels: SystemHealth-Sheriff

Sign in to add a comment