New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like █ or █) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 634399 link

Starred by 2 users
Status: Duplicate
Merged: issue 633527
Owner:
█ petrcermak@chromium.org
Last visit > 30 days ago
Closed: Aug 2016
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression

Blocked on:
issue 638174


Sign in to add a comment

366.7% regression in system_health.memory_desktop at 406527:408984

Project Member Reported by petrcermak@chromium.org, Aug 4 2016 
See the link to graphs below.

Comment 1 by petrcermak@chromium.org, Aug 4 2016 

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=634399

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgpsz67wgM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win7-dual
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Aug 5 2016 


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: failed


===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N  Good?
chromium@406526  1080504  9129.59  5  good
chromium@408984  6211258  932536   5  bad

Bisect job ran on: win_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 634399

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_desktop
Test Metric: load_social-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:skia:effective_size_avg/load_social_facebook
Relative Change: 474.85%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_perf_bisect/builds/6801
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005236654151588272


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5776330990288896

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Aug 5 2016 


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: failed


===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N  Good?
chromium@406526  1080504  9129.59  5  good
chromium@408984  6211258  932536   5  bad

Bisect job ran on: win_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 634399

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_desktop
Test Metric: load_social-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:skia:effective_size_avg/load_social_facebook
Relative Change: 474.85%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_perf_bisect/builds/6801
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005236654151588272


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5776330990288896

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Aug 6 2016 

Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_perf_bisect/builds/6807
Failure reason: the build has failed.
Additional errors:
The metric was not found in the test output.
Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.
Project Member

Comment 10 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Aug 13 2016 

Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_perf_bisect/builds/6807
Failure reason: the build has failed.
Additional errors:
The metric was not found in the test output.
Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.
Project Member

Comment 12 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Aug 16 2016 


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: failed


===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N  Good?
chromium@408937  3050661  36635.7  6  good
chromium@408942  3077285  37284.2  8  good
chromium@408946  3180299  45334.4  5  bad
chromium@408955  3216344  12756.9  5  bad
chromium@408972  3188491  48694.8  4  bad
chromium@409007  3188491  43444.6  5  bad
chromium@409076  3172107  36977.6  5  bad

Bisect job ran on: mac_hdd_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 634399

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_desktop
Test Metric: load_search-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:partition_alloc:effective_size_avg/load_search_baidu
Relative Change: 4.65%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_hdd_perf_bisect/builds/731
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004270379768398864


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5829207087644672

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!

Comment 13 by petrcermak@chromium.org, Aug 16 2016

Blockedon: 638174
Project Member

Comment 15 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Aug 16 2016 


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: failed


===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N  Good?
chromium@408937  3050661  36635.7  6  good
chromium@408942  3077285  37284.2  8  good
chromium@408946  3180299  45334.4  5  bad
chromium@408955  3216344  12756.9  5  bad
chromium@408972  3188491  48694.8  4  bad
chromium@409007  3188491  43444.6  5  bad
chromium@409076  3172107  36977.6  5  bad

Bisect job ran on: mac_hdd_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 634399

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_desktop
Test Metric: load_search-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:partition_alloc:effective_size_avg/load_search_baidu
Relative Change: 4.65%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_hdd_perf_bisect/builds/731
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004270379768398864


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5829207087644672

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 17 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Aug 17 2016

Mergedinto: 633527
Status: Duplicate (was: Assigned)

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


===== SUSPECTED CL(s) =====
Subject : Refactoring: Make member variables in Resource private
Author  : hajimehoshi
Commit description:
  
This CL moves some member variables in Resource class from protected to
private to improve code health.

BUG=n/a
TEST=webkit_unit_tests

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2199713002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#408943}
Commit  : 33e8546b6e54b2a38d9baa327f45238cf6d64c28
Date    : Mon Aug 01 11:50:46 2016


===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N  Good?
chromium@408937  3068683  37045.6  5  good
chromium@408942  3059672  30842.6  5  good
chromium@408943  3201598  32946.7  5  bad    <--
chromium@408944  3187672  33073.8  5  bad
chromium@408946  3194225  40195.1  5  bad
chromium@408955  3184395  40236.8  5  bad
chromium@408972  3190129  56355.4  5  bad
chromium@409007  3173745  31541.9  5  bad
chromium@409076  3204875  23170.5  5  bad

Bisect job ran on: mac_hdd_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 634399

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_desktop
Test Metric: load_search-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:partition_alloc:effective_size_avg/load_search_baidu
Relative Change: 4.44%
Score: 99.9

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_hdd_perf_bisect/builds/737
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004270379768398864


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5829207087644672

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!

Comment 18 by petrcermak@chromium.org, Aug 30 2016

Labels: SystemHealth-Sheriff
►

Sign in to add a comment