Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
172% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 405962:405970 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Aug 3 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005355075996993968
,
Aug 3 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@405961 11610168 6547915 12 good chromium@405970 10398776 4136830 8 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus7_perf_bisect Bug ID: 633950 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_mobile Test Metric: load_social-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:gpu:effective_size_avg/load_social_facebook Relative Change: 19.02% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus7_perf_bisect/builds/3143 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005355075996993968 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5886200951341056 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Aug 3 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005329347951970384
,
Aug 4 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : Reland of -enable GPU Rasterization for content with any author defined viewport. (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2155193002/ ) Author : picksi Commit description: Reason for revert: CL falsely blamed for red layout test. Relanding it. Original issue's description: > Revert of -enable GPU Rasterization for content with any author defined viewport. (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2154193002/ ) > > Reason for revert: > Relanding this has potentially caused a layout test to fail (https://build.chromium.org/p/chromium.webkit/builders/WebKit%20Linux%20%28dbg%29/builds/8452). The build sheriff has asked me to revert it. > > Adding aelias & vmiura so they can do a more refined revert on their return from vacation. > > Original issue's description: > > Reland of -enable GPU Rasterization for content with any author defined viewport. (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2156553002/ ) > > > > Reason for revert: > > Reverting change now that we have collected data from telemetry. > > > > Original issue's description: > > > Revert of Re-enable GPU Rasterization for content with any author defined viewport. (patchset #2 id:20001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2097413003/ ) > > > > > > Reason for revert: > > > This has caused an unexpectedly large regression in overall PSS (about 5MB, graph here: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/report?sid=0b072725c25637efb0d3a44383da1e24e42bbb3740a00505e4040af2173423b0&start_rev=402061&end_rev=402790). > > > The owners are both OOO and this is blocking Android release. This has already been reverted in the release branch but our infrastructure cannot gather data from the branch to confirm that the revert has had the intended result. > > > > > > This revert will allow us to confirm that this CL was the cause of the regression. Once confirmed (or otherwise) via telemetry dashboards this revert will be re-reverted. > > > > > > Original issue's description: > > > > Re-enable GPU Rasterization for content with any author defined viewport. > > > > > > > > BUG= 591179 > > > > > > > > Committed: https://crrev.com/a017b667a53b3ee5f8bc630be98c37ebf53a2339 > > > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#402702} > > > > > > TBR=aelias@chromium.org,chrishtr@chromium.org,vmiura@chromium.org > > > # Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed more than 1 days ago. > > > BUG= 591179 > > > > > > Committed: https://crrev.com/10a77702aa0490dfaaa6e354151b24b738474fb4 > > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#405750} > > > > TBR=aelias@chromium.org,chrishtr@chromium.org,vmiura@chromium.org,primiano@chromium.org > > # Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed more than 1 days ago. > > BUG= 591179 > > > > Committed: https://crrev.com/5f19720ded2369857bee408ab48e11e7b5d28f7b > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#405974} > > TBR=aelias@chromium.org,chrishtr@chromium.org,vmiura@chromium.org,primiano@chromium.org > # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago. > NOPRESUBMIT=true > NOTREECHECKS=true > NOTRY=true > BUG= 591179 > > Committed: https://crrev.com/1ce44d25cbafd74f034c30ddfd4b0f3caed9978d > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#405983} TBR=aelias@chromium.org,chrishtr@chromium.org,vmiura@chromium.org,primiano@chromium.org,alexclarke@chromium.org # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago. NOPRESUBMIT=true NOTREECHECKS=true NOTRY=true BUG= 591179 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2161663002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#406004} Commit : c67c6db688d379d0a5d2eb7cdd6853e7ce8da281 Date : Mon Jul 18 15:57:52 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@405961 10160184 4076383 8 good chromium@406002 10139192 5567841 8 good chromium@406003 11371576 6266831 8 good chromium@406004 21695052 0.0 8 bad <-- chromium@406005 22234444 1525631 8 bad chromium@406007 21695052 0.0 8 bad chromium@406012 21155660 1525631 8 bad chromium@406022 21155660 1525631 8 bad chromium@406042 21695052 2306537 8 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus7_perf_bisect Bug ID: 633950 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_mobile Test Metric: load_social-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:gpu:effective_size_avg/load_social_facebook Relative Change: 81.61% Score: 99.9 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus7_perf_bisect/builds/3145 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005329347951970384 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5882009465913344 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Aug 30 2016
,
Aug 30 2016
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by petrcermak@chromium.org
, Aug 3 2016