Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
359.7%-1895.6% regression in system_health.memory_desktop at 406532:408995 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Aug 2 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005450803133899968
,
Aug 2 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@406549 21806350 799.608 12 good chromium@408985 21806342 818.425 8 bad Bisect job ran on: mac_retina_perf_bisect Bug ID: 633529 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_desktop Test Metric: load_social-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:skia:effective_size_avg/load_social_facebook Relative Change: 0.00% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_retina_perf_bisect/builds/1507 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005450803133899968 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5795818733305856 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Aug 3 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005329047713010272
,
Aug 15 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004247583987379488
,
Aug 16 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : Refactoring: Make member variables in Resource private Author : hajimehoshi Commit description: This CL moves some member variables in Resource class from protected to private to improve code health. BUG=n/a TEST=webkit_unit_tests Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2199713002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#408943} Commit : 33e8546b6e54b2a38d9baa327f45238cf6d64c28 Date : Mon Aug 01 11:50:46 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@408936 5704499 51681.1 5 good chromium@408942 5709414 65125.1 5 good chromium@408943 6149704 36635.7 5 bad <-- chromium@408944 6125947 53200.7 5 bad chromium@408946 6129224 54185.0 5 bad chromium@408958 6125947 44342.9 5 bad Bisect job ran on: winx64_zen_perf_bisect Bug ID: 633529 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_desktop Test Metric: load_media-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:partition_alloc:effective_size_avg/load_media_google_images Relative Change: 7.39% Score: 99.9 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64_zen_perf_bisect/builds/381 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004247583987379488 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5848457667936256 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Aug 30 2016
,
Aug 30 2016
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by petrcermak@chromium.org
, Aug 2 2016