New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 633231 link

Starred by 2 users

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner:
Last visit > 30 days ago
Closed: Aug 2016
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

21.9%-26.6% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 407919:408831

Project Member Reported by petrcermak@chromium.org, Aug 1 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N  Good?
chromium@407918  9205760  1100395  8  good
chromium@408831  9281536  1314078  8  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 633231

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_mobile
Test Metric: load_tools-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:java_heap:private_dirty_size_avg/load_tools_docs
Relative Change: 2.23%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/410
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005518566065834848


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5794801362927616

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N  Good?
chromium@407918  9043456  1202532  8  good
chromium@408831  8664064  698354   8  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 633231

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_mobile
Test Metric: load_tools-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:java_heap:private_dirty_size_avg/load_tools_docs
Relative Change: 9.29%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/446
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005163307788104416


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5833673635528704

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N  Good?
chromium@407779  9364992  1164102  8  good
chromium@408831  9420800  1184423  8  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 633231

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_mobile
Test Metric: load_tools-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:java_heap:private_dirty_size_avg/load_tools_docs
Relative Change: 0.11%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/463
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004899673133178640


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5803422536695808

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N  Good?
chromium@407918  9395712  1393393  8  good
chromium@408831  8855040  777332   8  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 633231

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_mobile
Test Metric: load_news-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:java_heap:private_dirty_size_avg/load_news_hackernews
Relative Change: 11.91%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/471
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004800064780085648


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5270755525263360

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 11 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Aug 10 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N  Good?
chromium@407500  9749504  1205644  8  good
chromium@409500  9038336  892461   8  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 633231

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_mobile
Test Metric: load_news-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:java_heap:private_dirty_size_avg/load_news_hackernews
Relative Change: 13.64%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/484
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004715900052562640


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6393689757188096

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Status: WontFix (was: Assigned)
I'm unable to reproduce the regression in a bisect.
Labels: SystemHealth-Sheriff
Labels: -Performance-Sheriff

Sign in to add a comment