Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
21.9%-26.6% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 407919:408831 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Aug 1 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005518566065834848
,
Aug 1 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@407918 9205760 1100395 8 good chromium@408831 9281536 1314078 8 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Bug ID: 633231 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_mobile Test Metric: load_tools-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:java_heap:private_dirty_size_avg/load_tools_docs Relative Change: 2.23% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/410 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005518566065834848 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5794801362927616 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Aug 5 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005163307788104416
,
Aug 5 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@407918 9043456 1202532 8 good chromium@408831 8664064 698354 8 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Bug ID: 633231 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_mobile Test Metric: load_tools-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:java_heap:private_dirty_size_avg/load_tools_docs Relative Change: 9.29% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/446 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005163307788104416 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5833673635528704 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Aug 8 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004899673133178640
,
Aug 8 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@407779 9364992 1164102 8 good chromium@408831 9420800 1184423 8 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Bug ID: 633231 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_mobile Test Metric: load_tools-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:java_heap:private_dirty_size_avg/load_tools_docs Relative Change: 0.11% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/463 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004899673133178640 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5803422536695808 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Aug 9 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004800064780085648
,
Aug 9 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@407918 9395712 1393393 8 good chromium@408831 8855040 777332 8 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Bug ID: 633231 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_mobile Test Metric: load_news-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:java_heap:private_dirty_size_avg/load_news_hackernews Relative Change: 11.91% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/471 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004800064780085648 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5270755525263360 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Aug 10 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004715900052562640
,
Aug 10 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@407500 9749504 1205644 8 good chromium@409500 9038336 892461 8 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Bug ID: 633231 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_mobile Test Metric: load_news-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:java_heap:private_dirty_size_avg/load_news_hackernews Relative Change: 13.64% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/484 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004715900052562640 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6393689757188096 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Aug 11 2016
I'm unable to reproduce the regression in a bisect.
,
Aug 30 2016
,
Aug 30 2016
|
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by petrcermak@chromium.org
, Aug 1 2016