New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like █ or █) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 633225 link

Starred by 2 users
Status: Duplicate
Merged: issue 633537
Owner:
█ hpayer@chromium.org
Last visit > 30 days ago
Closed: Aug 2016
Cc:
█ hpayer@chromium.org
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

7.6% regression in system_health.memory_desktop at 407780:407967

Project Member Reported by petrcermak@chromium.org, Aug 1 2016 
See the link to graphs below.

Comment 1 by petrcermak@chromium.org, Aug 1 2016 

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=633225

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICguv3KzwgM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win10
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Aug 3 2016 


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: failed


===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision                       Mean      Std Dev  N  Good?
chromium@407779                13688832  0.0      5  good
chromium@407874                13680640  0.0      5  good
chromium@407880                13680640  0.0      5  good
chromium@407880,v8@d05c2f02c5  14729216  0.0      5  bad
chromium@407881                14519501  468937   5  bad
chromium@407882                14729216  0.0      5  bad
chromium@407883                14729216  0.0      5  bad
chromium@407886                14729216  0.0      5  bad
chromium@407898                14729216  0.0      5  bad
chromium@407922                14729216  0.0      5  bad
chromium@407967                14729216  0.0      5  bad

Bisect job ran on: winx64_10_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 633225

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_desktop
Test Metric: load_search-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/load_search_yahoo
Relative Change: 7.60%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64_10_perf_bisect/builds/628
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005519249342551632


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5828867164471296

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Aug 3 2016 


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: failed


===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision                       Mean      Std Dev  N  Good?
chromium@407779                13688832  0.0      5  good
chromium@407874                13680640  0.0      5  good
chromium@407880                13680640  0.0      5  good
chromium@407880,v8@d05c2f02c5  14729216  0.0      5  bad
chromium@407881                14519501  468937   5  bad
chromium@407882                14729216  0.0      5  bad
chromium@407883                14729216  0.0      5  bad
chromium@407886                14729216  0.0      5  bad
chromium@407898                14729216  0.0      5  bad
chromium@407922                14729216  0.0      5  bad
chromium@407967                14729216  0.0      5  bad

Bisect job ran on: winx64_10_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 633225

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_desktop
Test Metric: load_search-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/load_search_yahoo
Relative Change: 7.60%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64_10_perf_bisect/builds/628
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005519249342551632


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5828867164471296

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Aug 4 2016

Cc: hpayer@chromium.org
Owner: hpayer@chromium.org

=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author hpayer@chromium.org ===

Hi hpayer@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL below as possibly
causing a regression. Please have a look at this info and see whether
your CL be related.


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


===== SUSPECTED CL(s) =====
Subject : [heap] Reland "Remove black pages and use black areas instead."
Author  : hpayer
Commit description:
  
BUG=630969, 630386 
LOG=n

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2185613002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#38057}
Commit  : 9e37a07c8de0a20ef2681e26824ff4d329102603
Date    : Tue Jul 26 14:42:48 2016


===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision                       Mean      Std Dev  N  Good?
chromium@407779                13688832  0.0      5  good
chromium@407874                13890355  468937   5  good
chromium@407880                13680640  0.0      5  good
chromium@407880,v8@968d3bce58  13680640  0.0      5  good
chromium@407880,v8@e1ad114ed2  13680640  0.0      5  good
chromium@407880,v8@9e37a07c8d  14729216  0.0      5  bad    <--
chromium@407880,v8@d05c2f02c5  14729216  0.0      5  bad
chromium@407881                14729216  0.0      5  bad
chromium@407882                14729216  0.0      5  bad
chromium@407883                14729216  0.0      5  bad
chromium@407886                14729216  0.0      5  bad
chromium@407898                14729216  0.0      5  bad
chromium@407922                14729216  0.0      5  bad
chromium@407967                14729216  0.0      5  bad

Bisect job ran on: winx64_10_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 633225

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_desktop
Test Metric: load_search-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/load_search_yahoo
Relative Change: 7.60%
Score: 99.9

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64_10_perf_bisect/builds/645
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005519249342551632


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5828867164471296

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!

Comment 8 by hpayer@chromium.org, Aug 9 2016

Mergedinto: 633537
Status: Duplicate (was: Assigned)

Comment 9 by petrcermak@chromium.org, Aug 30 2016

Labels: SystemHealth-Sheriff

Comment 10 by petrcermak@chromium.org, Aug 30 2016

Labels: -Performance-Sheriff
►

Sign in to add a comment