New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 633195 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner:
Closed: May 2017
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

3.1%-3.8% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 408636:408689

Project Member Reported by petrcermak@chromium.org, Aug 1 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=633195

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgxr_VvwkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgxq7yvwoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-galaxy-s5
android-nexus7v2
Project Member

Comment 4 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Aug 16 2016

Cc: csmartdalton@google.com
Owner: csmartdalton@google.com

=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author csmartdalton@google.com ===

Hi csmartdalton@google.com, the bisect results pointed to your CL below as possibly
causing a regression. Please have a look at this info and see whether
your CL be related.


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


===== SUSPECTED CL(s) =====
Subject : Add test configs for instanced rendering
Author  : csmartdalton
Commit description:
  
Adds the following configs and enables them on select bots:

  glinst, glinst4, glinstdit4, glinst16, glinstdit16,
  esinst, esinst4, esinstdit4

Makes general changes to GrContextOptions, GrCaps, etc. to facilitate
this.

BUG=skia:
GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search?issue=2182783004

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2182783004
Commit  : e0d362929d6569e8737d80dead791c640390e819
Date    : Fri Jul 29 15:14:20 2016


===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision                         Mean     Std Dev  N  Good?
chromium@408635                  1196851  5340.53  5  good
chromium@408647                  1205862  6211.89  5  good
chromium@408653                  1206682  3663.57  5  good
chromium@408656                  1207296  5688.24  8  good
chromium@408657                  1209344  6095.04  8  good
chromium@408657,skia@0d9990f052  1212416  2896.31  5  good
chromium@408657,skia@e0d362929d  1221120  4059.26  8  bad    <--
chromium@408658                  1219789  5340.53  5  bad
chromium@408659                  1227162  6211.89  5  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_s5_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 633195

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_mobile
Test Metric: load_tools-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:system_memory:ashmem:private_dirty_size_avg/load_tools_dropbox
Relative Change: 2.53%
Score: 99.9

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_s5_perf_bisect/builds/912
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004248384336572256


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5790902556033024

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Labels: SystemHealth-Sheriff
Labels: -Performance-Sheriff

Comment 7 by rbyers@chromium.org, Nov 18 2016

Labels: Performance
Status: WontFix (was: Assigned)
This regression has been included in a stable release and that stable channel is now deprecated. I'm closing this so that we won't have unresponsive performance regressions in the future. 

Sign in to add a comment