New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 633130 link

Starred by 3 users

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner:
Last visit > 30 days ago
Closed: Sep 2016
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: Windows
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

31.1% regression in startup.cold.blank_page at 408861:408865

Project Member Reported by alexclarke@chromium.org, Aug 1 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=633130

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgxv-SuAkM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win7-gpu-intel
Cc: thestig@chromium.org
Owner: thestig@chromium.org

=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author thestig@chromium.org ===

Hi thestig@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL below as possibly
causing a regression. Please have a look at this info and see whether
your CL be related.


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


===== SUSPECTED CL(s) =====
Subject : Linux: Fix up sysroot_scripts.
Author  : thestig
Commit description:
  
- Use the right repo for Ubuntu ARM(64)
- Add checks for valid architectures so the "All" commands work.
- Try to fix up some bashisms
- And give up on the rest and just switch to bash

BUG= 632522 

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2193903004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#408861}
Commit  : a96ed125a4d07e68c90f49f7569e11db124aef51
Date    : Sat Jul 30 05:00:53 2016


===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N  Good?
chromium@408860  5400.88  85.6824  5  good
chromium@408861  4930.44  124.204  5  bad    <--
chromium@408862  4977.04  165.638  5  bad
chromium@408863  4890.24  115.319  5  bad
chromium@408865  5032.4   83.8807  5  bad

Bisect job ran on: winx64intel_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 633130

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests startup.cold.blank_page
Test Metric: window_display_time/window_display_time
Relative Change: 6.82%
Score: 99.5

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/winx64intel_perf_bisect/builds/1073
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005542003003321216


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5904827217870848

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Cc: -thestig@chromium.org
Labels: OS-Windows
Owner: ----
Status: Unconfirmed (was: Assigned)
Linux build script changes can't cause Windows bots to get slower.
Owner: alexclarke@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Unconfirmed)
Status: WontFix (was: Assigned)
Ref build moved here too.

Sign in to add a comment