Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
7.1% regression in service_worker.service_worker_micro_benchmark at 407900:407925 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Aug 1 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005543279131667312
,
Aug 1 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@407899 4.90417 0.0499779 18 good chromium@407925 4.92222 0.0519961 18 bad Bisect job ran on: mac_retina_perf_bisect Bug ID: 633097 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests service_worker.service_worker_micro_benchmark Test Metric: concurrent_10_response_50_percentile/concurrent_10_response_50_percentile Relative Change: 1.02% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_retina_perf_bisect/builds/1486 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005543279131667312 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5781648294019072 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Aug 1 2016
WONTFIX. A suspicious CL was not found and the regression was quite small. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by nhiroki@chromium.org
, Aug 1 2016