Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
125% regression in media.android.tough_video_cases at 407005:407125 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Aug 1 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005558560353453440
,
Aug 1 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@407004 32.3333 5.7735 12 good chromium@407125 16.6667 59.6678 12 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Bug ID: 633033 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests media.android.tough_video_cases Test Metric: vm_shared_dirty_delta/crowd.wav_gpu Relative Change: 13.89% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/403 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005558560353453440 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5875678549901312 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Aug 18 2016
Perf sheriff ping: reminder to follow up on possible performance issues
,
Sep 22 2016
|
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by hubbe@chromium.org
, Aug 1 2016