New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 632663 link

Starred by 2 users

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner:
Last visit > 30 days ago
Closed: Aug 2016
Cc:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: Android
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

1.4% regression in page_cycler.top_10_mobile at 407505:407614

Project Member Reported by alexclarke@chromium.org, Jul 29 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=632663

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICghs24qQkM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-galaxy-s5
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jul 29 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean    Std Dev  N  Good?
chromium@407504  117143  1012.48  9  good
chromium@407614  117552  892.451  8  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_s5_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 632663

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests page_cycler.top_10_mobile
Test Metric: vm_proportional_set_size_final_total/vm_proportional_set_size_final_total
Relative Change: 0.06%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_s5_perf_bisect/builds/845
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005812296508447024


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5802070662184960

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Trying another bisect.
Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jul 30 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean    Std Dev  N  Good?
chromium@407400  117847  618.646  8  good
chromium@407700  117590  520.533  8  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_s5_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 632663

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests page_cycler.top_10_mobile
Test Metric: vm_proportional_set_size_final_total/vm_proportional_set_size_final_total
Relative Change: 0.52%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_s5_perf_bisect/builds/851
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005788003017372112


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5772650673078272

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Status: WontFix (was: Assigned)
Might just be noise. Don't think the bisects will find anything real here, closing.
Cc: alexclarke@chromium.org
 Issue 632662  has been merged into this issue.

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean    Std Dev  N  Good?
chromium@407504  112240  831.023  8  good
chromium@407614  112677  540.659  8  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_s5_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 632663

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests page_cycler.top_10_mobile
Test Metric: vm_proportional_set_size_final_total/https___mobile.twitter.com_justinbieber?skip_interstitial_true
Relative Change: 0.11%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_s5_perf_bisect/builds/895
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005138425648228784


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5838464772210688

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!

Sign in to add a comment