Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.4% regression in page_cycler.top_10_mobile at 407505:407614 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jul 29 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005812297389465168
,
Jul 29 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@407504 117338 798.412 9 good chromium@407614 117503 1143.62 8 bad Bisect job ran on: android_s5_perf_bisect Bug ID: 632662 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests page_cycler.top_10_mobile Test Metric: vm_proportional_set_size_final_total/vm_proportional_set_size_final_total Relative Change: 0.25% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_s5_perf_bisect/builds/846 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005812297389465168 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5825692311224320 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jul 29 2016
Hmm I have a feeling we may need to split this bug up :( I kicked off a few bisects lets see if they finger different things.
,
Aug 5 2016
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by alexclarke@chromium.org
, Jul 29 2016