Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
47.8%-49% regression in tracing.tracing_with_debug_overhead at 408246:408294 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jul 29 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005812306572654016
,
Jul 29 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@408245 14872.9 976.582 18 good chromium@408294 14072.8 1755.79 18 bad Bisect job ran on: android_one_perf_bisect Bug ID: 632661 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests tracing.tracing_with_debug_overhead Test Metric: Max number of events per second/Max number of events per second Relative Change: 15.61% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_one_perf_bisect/builds/1447 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005812306572654016 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5815216214900736 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jul 29 2016
Looks like a false alert, the ref moved too. |
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by alexclarke@chromium.org
, Jul 29 2016