New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 632656 link

Starred by 2 users

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner:
Last visit > 30 days ago
Closed: Aug 2016
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

14.8% regression in tab_switching.typical_25 at 408380:408405

Project Member Reported by alexclarke@chromium.org, Jul 29 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=632656

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICghrvUpwkM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-mac-retina
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jul 29 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@408379  5334.72  228.487  18  good
chromium@408405  5138.0   494.981  18  bad

Bisect job ran on: mac_retina_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 632656

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests tab_switching.typical_25
Test Metric: idle_wakeups_total/idle_wakeups_total
Relative Change: 2.89%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_retina_perf_bisect/builds/1464
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005812362986770672


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5854111438733312

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
I notice the graph had improved before recovering, maybe something got reverted.
Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jul 29 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@408350  5252.72  213.758  18  good
chromium@408420  5154.94  546.346  18  bad

Bisect job ran on: mac_retina_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 632656

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests tab_switching.typical_25
Test Metric: idle_wakeups_total/idle_wakeups_total
Relative Change: 4.07%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_retina_perf_bisect/builds/1470
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005802719728062752


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5806760766472192

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
I'm not convinced we'll find anything here :(
Status: WontFix (was: Assigned)
Yeah, let's not worry about it.

Sign in to add a comment