Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
5.7% regression in memory.mobile_memory at 408133:408179 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jul 29 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005812538067646800
,
Jul 29 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@408132 28759.0 664.72 18 good chromium@408179 28661.1 838.118 18 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Bug ID: 632650 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests memory.mobile_memory Test Metric: vm_private_dirty_final_browser/vm_private_dirty_final_browser Relative Change: 0.34% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/386 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005812538067646800 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5771187431407616 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jul 29 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005802557269603504
,
Jul 29 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005800637870164288
,
Jul 29 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@408000 28662.7 626.909 18 good chromium@408200 28599.1 721.373 18 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Bug ID: 632650 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests memory.mobile_memory Test Metric: vm_private_dirty_final_browser/vm_private_dirty_final_browser Relative Change: 0.12% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/389 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005800637870164288 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5818440661598208 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jul 29 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005790923004124432
,
Jul 29 2016
Trying again.
,
Jul 29 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@408000 28610.3 656.3 18 good chromium@408200 28666.5 691.04 18 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Bug ID: 632650 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests memory.mobile_memory Test Metric: vm_private_dirty_final_browser/vm_private_dirty_final_browser Relative Change: 0.42% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/391 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005790923004124432 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5775256912920576 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jul 29 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005765713854133184
,
Jul 29 2016
Bisect failed: Unknown Failure reason: the build has failed. Additional errors: The revision range could not be expanded, or the commit positions could not be resolved into commit hashes.
,
Jul 30 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005671570322660464
,
Jul 30 2016
Bisect failed: Unknown Failure reason: the build has failed. Additional errors: The revision range could not be expanded, or the commit positions could not be resolved into commit hashes.
,
Aug 1 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005541463109794688
,
Aug 1 2016
Trying again.
,
Aug 1 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005521066474327984
,
Aug 2 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005429924160096432
,
Aug 2 2016
Bisect failed: Unknown Failure reason: the build has failed. Additional errors: The revision range could not be expanded, or the commit positions could not be resolved into commit hashes.
,
Aug 6 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005036550913219120
,
Aug 6 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@408132 28625.9 614.73 18 good chromium@408179 28549.3 715.707 18 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Bug ID: 632650 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests memory.mobile_memory Test Metric: vm_private_dirty_final_browser/vm_private_dirty_final_browser Relative Change: 0.38% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/400 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005671570322660464 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5907582976262144 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Aug 9 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004793802762863712
,
Aug 9 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@408132 28641.6 698.747 18 good chromium@408179 28465.8 766.03 18 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Bug ID: 632650 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests memory.mobile_memory Test Metric: vm_private_dirty_final_browser/vm_private_dirty_final_browser Relative Change: 0.93% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/418 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005429924160096432 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6415151205449728 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Aug 18 2016
Perf sheriff ping: reminder to follow up on possible performance issues
,
Sep 23 2016
Bisect bots can't reproduce. |
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by alexclarke@chromium.org
, Jul 29 2016