New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 632650 link

Starred by 2 users

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner:
Last visit > 30 days ago
Closed: Sep 2016
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

5.7% regression in memory.mobile_memory at 408133:408179

Project Member Reported by alexclarke@chromium.org, Jul 29 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=632650

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICguoGwkAsM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

android-nexus5X
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jul 29 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@408132  28759.0  664.72   18  good
chromium@408179  28661.1  838.118  18  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 632650

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests memory.mobile_memory
Test Metric: vm_private_dirty_final_browser/vm_private_dirty_final_browser
Relative Change: 0.34%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/386
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005812538067646800


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5771187431407616

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jul 29 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@408000  28662.7  626.909  18  good
chromium@408200  28599.1  721.373  18  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 632650

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests memory.mobile_memory
Test Metric: vm_private_dirty_final_browser/vm_private_dirty_final_browser
Relative Change: 0.12%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/389
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005800637870164288


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5818440661598208

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Trying again.
Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jul 29 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@408000  28610.3  656.3    18  good
chromium@408200  28666.5  691.04   18  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 632650

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests memory.mobile_memory
Test Metric: vm_private_dirty_final_browser/vm_private_dirty_final_browser
Relative Change: 0.42%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/391
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005790923004124432


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5775256912920576

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 11 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jul 29 2016

Bisect failed: Unknown
Failure reason: the build has failed.
Additional errors:
The revision range could not be expanded, or the commit positions could not be resolved into commit hashes.

Project Member

Comment 13 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jul 30 2016

Bisect failed: Unknown
Failure reason: the build has failed.
Additional errors:
The revision range could not be expanded, or the commit positions could not be resolved into commit hashes.

Trying again.
Bisect failed: Unknown
Failure reason: the build has failed.
Additional errors:
The revision range could not be expanded, or the commit positions could not be resolved into commit hashes.


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@408132  28625.9  614.73   18  good
chromium@408179  28549.3  715.707  18  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 632650

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests memory.mobile_memory
Test Metric: vm_private_dirty_final_browser/vm_private_dirty_final_browser
Relative Change: 0.38%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/400
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005671570322660464


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5907582976262144

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@408132  28641.6  698.747  18  good
chromium@408179  28465.8  766.03   18  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 632650

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests memory.mobile_memory
Test Metric: vm_private_dirty_final_browser/vm_private_dirty_final_browser
Relative Change: 0.93%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/418
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005429924160096432


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6415151205449728

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Perf sheriff ping: reminder to follow up on possible performance issues
Status: WontFix (was: Assigned)
Bisect bots can't reproduce.

Sign in to add a comment