New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 632643 link

Starred by 2 users

Issue metadata

Status: Duplicate
Merged: issue 632292
Owner:
Last visit > 30 days ago
Closed: Jul 2016
Components:
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

2.1% regression in smoothness.gpu_rasterization_and_decoding.image_decoding_cases at 408209:408245

Project Member Reported by alexclarke@chromium.org, Jul 29 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=632643

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICghqTAoAoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

linux-release
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jul 29 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev   N   Good?
chromium@408208  16.8376  0.112028  18  good
chromium@408245  16.8272  0.13587   18  bad

Bisect job ran on: linux_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 632643

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests smoothness.gpu_rasterization_and_decoding.image_decoding_cases
Test Metric: frame_times/frame_times
Relative Change: 0.20%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/linux_perf_bisect/builds/6610
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005812787891860144


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5824940020858880

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Might be a glitch.  Trying a wider bisect with more iterations.
Project Member

Comment 6 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jul 29 2016

Mergedinto: 632292
Status: Duplicate (was: Assigned)

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


===== SUSPECTED CL(s) =====
Subject : Turn on enable begin frame scheduling by default
Author  : enne
Commit description:
  
This turns on --enable-begin-frame-scheduling for all platforms but mus
and Blimp.  This change means browser->renderer begin frame ticks
instead of sending vsync information and having a synthetic source on
the renderer side.  This feature was already on for Android so should
only be a real change for desktop / ChromeOS platforms.

Lots of cleanup can follow from this like removing all commit vsync /
authoritative vsync / CompositorVSyncManager things, but this is a
smaller patch to suss out any performance regressions.

This previously landed and regressed a number of metrics.  Some of these
have been investigated and fixed and the rest are WontFix.

CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.blink:linux_blink_rel

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1939253002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#408172}
Commit  : d020d554c9ffc0476d43f5364a47c522b64e3d9a
Date    : Wed Jul 27 17:45:34 2016


===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev     N   Good?
chromium@408108  16.7091  0.0428963   12  good
chromium@408143  16.6687  0.0230342   12  good
chromium@408160  16.6884  0.0402628   12  good
chromium@408169  16.6713  0.0206936   8   good
chromium@408171  16.6734  0.00699422  8   good
chromium@408172  16.9521  0.193399    5   bad    <--
chromium@408173  16.8204  0.135242    8   bad
chromium@408177  16.814   0.0922782   8   bad
chromium@408245  16.8715  0.14575     18  bad

Bisect job ran on: linux_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 632643

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests smoothness.gpu_rasterization_and_decoding.image_decoding_cases
Test Metric: frame_times/frame_times
Relative Change: 0.71%
Score: 98.0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/linux_perf_bisect/builds/6611
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005806331456591840


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5797803612176384

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!

Sign in to add a comment