Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
10.3% regression in top_10_mobile_memory at 406232:406252 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jul 26 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9006080691539061824
,
Jul 26 2016
Given that this is a regression in the v8 metric (memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:allocated_objects_size_avg) and the CL in range of the two rolls (https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8/+log/9b382ab2..7a5e2fcd), I believe the only candidates are: - esiginer's: https://codereview.chromium.org/2156153002 - bmeurer's: https://codereview.chromium.org/2161943002 - bmeurer's: https://codereview.chromium.org/2151163002 (The first one looks a non-functional refactor to me but dunno) The other CLs in range seem MIPS or ia32-related to me.
,
Jul 26 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : Remove duplication of encoded image data Author : hajimehoshi Commit description: Now there are at least two encoded image data: one is in Image/ImageResource as SharedBuffer and the other is in DeferredImageDecoder as SkRWBuffer. This CL removes former when possible (non-icon bitmaps), and generate the SharedBuffer from the SkRWBuffer if needed. Design Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1v0yTAZ6wkqX2U_M6BNIGUJpM1s0TIw1VsqpxoL7aciY/edit?usp=sharing BUG= 618623 TEST=blink_platform_unittests --gtest_filter=BitmapImageTest.*:ImageDecoderTest.* Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2054643003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#406238} Commit : 36f4eb81d4a791a8e3dfea4ba2418465d30bcc90 Date : Tue Jul 19 10:02:08 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@406231 5373122 159235 12 good chromium@406237 5297962 27087.2 5 good chromium@406238 5604386 230724 5 bad <-- chromium@406239 5731915 131997 5 bad chromium@406240 5706261 161945 5 bad chromium@406242 5811075 243451 5 bad chromium@406252 5626523 266497 12 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus7_perf_bisect Bug ID: 631420 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests top_10_mobile_memory Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:allocated_objects_size_avg/http___en.m.wikipedia.org_wiki_Science Relative Change: 0.95% Score: 99.8 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus7_perf_bisect/builds/3097 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9006080691539061824 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5079423666094080 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by primiano@chromium.org
, Jul 26 2016