New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 631127 link

Starred by 2 users

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner:
Last visit > 30 days ago
Closed: Aug 2016
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

5.4%-11.6% regression in media.tough_video_cases_extra at 405221:405763

Project Member Reported by hubbe@chromium.org, Jul 25 2016

Issue description

This regression is related to seek performance.
However, it seems to only happen on one platform, so maybe it's a bot issue?

 
Project Member

Comment 4 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jul 25 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@405220  337.345  6.26484  18  good
chromium@405763  333.85   5.08553  18  bad

Bisect job ran on: win_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 631127

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests media.tough_video_cases_extra
Test Metric: seek/video.html?src_garden2_10s.webm
Relative Change: 1.07%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_perf_bisect/builds/6730
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9006143982439588288


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5511603072532480

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 5 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jul 29 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: failed


===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev   N  Good?
chromium@405220  15.7     0.276625  8  good
chromium@405491  16.33    0.471123  8  bad
chromium@405763  17.8525  2.0327    8  bad

Bisect job ran on: win_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 631127

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests media.tough_video_cases_extra
Test Metric: seek/tulip2.ogv_seek_cold
Relative Change: 17.04%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_perf_bisect/builds/6729
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9006144028836792320


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6701833804840960

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 7 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jul 29 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: failed


===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev   N  Good?
chromium@405220  15.7     0.276625  8  good
chromium@405491  16.33    0.471123  8  bad
chromium@405763  17.8525  2.0327    8  bad

Bisect job ran on: win_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 631127

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests media.tough_video_cases_extra
Test Metric: seek/tulip2.ogv_seek_cold
Relative Change: 17.04%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_perf_bisect/builds/6729
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9006144028836792320


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6701833804840960

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 9 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jul 30 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev   N   Good?
chromium@405220  15.7842  0.713299  18  good
chromium@405763  15.975   1.86519   18  bad

Bisect job ran on: win_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 631127

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests media.tough_video_cases_extra
Test Metric: seek/tulip2.ogv_seek_cold
Relative Change: 0.74%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_perf_bisect/builds/6747
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9006144028836792320


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6701833804840960

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Labels: -Performance-Sheriff
Status: WontFix (was: Assigned)
Can't reproduce.

Sign in to add a comment