Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
5.4%-11.6% regression in media.tough_video_cases_extra at 405221:405763 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionThis regression is related to seek performance. However, it seems to only happen on one platform, so maybe it's a bot issue?
,
Jul 25 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9006144028836792320
,
Jul 25 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9006143982439588288
,
Jul 25 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@405220 337.345 6.26484 18 good chromium@405763 333.85 5.08553 18 bad Bisect job ran on: win_perf_bisect Bug ID: 631127 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests media.tough_video_cases_extra Test Metric: seek/video.html?src_garden2_10s.webm Relative Change: 1.07% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_perf_bisect/builds/6730 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9006143982439588288 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5511603072532480 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jul 29 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@405220 15.7 0.276625 8 good chromium@405491 16.33 0.471123 8 bad chromium@405763 17.8525 2.0327 8 bad Bisect job ran on: win_perf_bisect Bug ID: 631127 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests media.tough_video_cases_extra Test Metric: seek/tulip2.ogv_seek_cold Relative Change: 17.04% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_perf_bisect/builds/6729 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9006144028836792320 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6701833804840960 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jul 29 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005837417760589392
,
Jul 29 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: failed ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@405220 15.7 0.276625 8 good chromium@405491 16.33 0.471123 8 bad chromium@405763 17.8525 2.0327 8 bad Bisect job ran on: win_perf_bisect Bug ID: 631127 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests media.tough_video_cases_extra Test Metric: seek/tulip2.ogv_seek_cold Relative Change: 17.04% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_perf_bisect/builds/6729 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9006144028836792320 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6701833804840960 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jul 30 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005742851094589312
,
Jul 30 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@405220 15.7842 0.713299 18 good chromium@405763 15.975 1.86519 18 bad Bisect job ran on: win_perf_bisect Bug ID: 631127 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests media.tough_video_cases_extra Test Metric: seek/tulip2.ogv_seek_cold Relative Change: 0.74% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_perf_bisect/builds/6747 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9006144028836792320 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6701833804840960 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Aug 5 2016
,
Aug 8 2016
Can't reproduce. |
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by hubbe@chromium.org
, Jul 25 2016