New issue
Advanced search Search tips
Note: Color blocks (like or ) mean that a user may not be available. Tooltip shows the reason.

Issue 631065 link

Starred by 1 user

Issue metadata

Status: Duplicate
Merged: issue 629502
Owner:
Last visit > 30 days ago
Closed: Jul 2016
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

11.4%-28965.1% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 405973:405981

Project Member Reported by petrcermak@chromium.org, Jul 25 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 
Project Member

Comment 3 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jul 26 2016

Mergedinto: 629502
Status: Duplicate (was: Assigned)

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


===== SUSPECTED CL(s) =====
Subject : Reland of -enable GPU Rasterization for content with any author defined viewport. (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2156553002/ )
Author  : picksi
Commit description:
  
Reason for revert:
Reverting change now that we have collected data from telemetry.

Original issue's description:
> Revert of Re-enable GPU Rasterization for content with any author defined viewport. (patchset #2 id:20001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2097413003/ )
>
> Reason for revert:
> This has caused an unexpectedly large regression in overall PSS (about 5MB, graph here: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/report?sid=0b072725c25637efb0d3a44383da1e24e42bbb3740a00505e4040af2173423b0&start_rev=402061&end_rev=402790).
> The owners are both OOO and this is blocking Android release. This has already been reverted in the release branch but our infrastructure cannot gather data from the branch to confirm that the revert has had the intended result.
>
> This revert will allow us to confirm that this CL was the cause of the regression. Once confirmed (or otherwise) via telemetry dashboards this revert will be re-reverted.
>
> Original issue's description:
> > Re-enable GPU Rasterization for content with any author defined viewport.
> >
> > BUG= 591179 
> >
> > Committed: https://crrev.com/a017b667a53b3ee5f8bc630be98c37ebf53a2339
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#402702}
>
> TBR=aelias@chromium.org,chrishtr@chromium.org,vmiura@chromium.org
> # Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed more than 1 days ago.
> BUG= 591179 
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/10a77702aa0490dfaaa6e354151b24b738474fb4
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#405750}

TBR=aelias@chromium.org,chrishtr@chromium.org,vmiura@chromium.org,primiano@chromium.org
# Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed more than 1 days ago.
BUG= 591179 

Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2154193002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#405974}
Commit  : 5f19720ded2369857bee408ab48e11e7b5d28f7b
Date    : Mon Jul 18 11:06:45 2016


===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean      Std Dev  N  Good?
chromium@405972  213348    0.0      5  good
chromium@405973  213348    0.0      5  good
chromium@405974  73613061  0.0      5  bad    <--
chromium@405975  73613061  0.0      5  bad
chromium@405977  73613061  0.0      5  bad
chromium@405981  73613061  0.0      5  bad

Bisect job ran on: android_nexus9_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 631065

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_mobile
Test Metric: load_social-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:skia:effective_size_avg/load_social_twitter
Relative Change: 34403.75%
Score: 99.9

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus9_perf_bisect/builds/1914
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9006152012421830032


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6067499884347392

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Labels: SystemHealth-Sheriff
Labels: -Performance-Sheriff

Sign in to add a comment