Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
11.4%-28965.1% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 405973:405981 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jul 25 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9006152012421830032
,
Jul 26 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : Reland of -enable GPU Rasterization for content with any author defined viewport. (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2156553002/ ) Author : picksi Commit description: Reason for revert: Reverting change now that we have collected data from telemetry. Original issue's description: > Revert of Re-enable GPU Rasterization for content with any author defined viewport. (patchset #2 id:20001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2097413003/ ) > > Reason for revert: > This has caused an unexpectedly large regression in overall PSS (about 5MB, graph here: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/report?sid=0b072725c25637efb0d3a44383da1e24e42bbb3740a00505e4040af2173423b0&start_rev=402061&end_rev=402790). > The owners are both OOO and this is blocking Android release. This has already been reverted in the release branch but our infrastructure cannot gather data from the branch to confirm that the revert has had the intended result. > > This revert will allow us to confirm that this CL was the cause of the regression. Once confirmed (or otherwise) via telemetry dashboards this revert will be re-reverted. > > Original issue's description: > > Re-enable GPU Rasterization for content with any author defined viewport. > > > > BUG= 591179 > > > > Committed: https://crrev.com/a017b667a53b3ee5f8bc630be98c37ebf53a2339 > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#402702} > > TBR=aelias@chromium.org,chrishtr@chromium.org,vmiura@chromium.org > # Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed more than 1 days ago. > BUG= 591179 > > Committed: https://crrev.com/10a77702aa0490dfaaa6e354151b24b738474fb4 > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#405750} TBR=aelias@chromium.org,chrishtr@chromium.org,vmiura@chromium.org,primiano@chromium.org # Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed more than 1 days ago. BUG= 591179 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2154193002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#405974} Commit : 5f19720ded2369857bee408ab48e11e7b5d28f7b Date : Mon Jul 18 11:06:45 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@405972 213348 0.0 5 good chromium@405973 213348 0.0 5 good chromium@405974 73613061 0.0 5 bad <-- chromium@405975 73613061 0.0 5 bad chromium@405977 73613061 0.0 5 bad chromium@405981 73613061 0.0 5 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus9_perf_bisect Bug ID: 631065 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_mobile Test Metric: load_social-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:skia:effective_size_avg/load_social_twitter Relative Change: 34403.75% Score: 99.9 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus9_perf_bisect/builds/1914 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9006152012421830032 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6067499884347392 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Aug 30 2016
,
Aug 30 2016
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by petrcermak@chromium.org
, Jul 25 2016