Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
4.2% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 407381:407384 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jul 25 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9006152901238071120
,
Jul 25 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@407380 7817576 116446 8 good chromium@407384 7844838 20852.5 8 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Bug ID: 631055 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_mobile Test Metric: browse_news-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:web_cache:effective_size_avg/browse_news_nytimes Relative Change: 0.76% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/362 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9006152901238071120 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5654102638329856 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Aug 5 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005152332299542912
,
Aug 6 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@407377 7550840 137093 8 good chromium@407384 7823197 61765.1 8 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Bug ID: 631055 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_mobile Test Metric: browse_news-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:web_cache:effective_size_avg/browse_news_nytimes Relative Change: 3.22% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/451 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005152332299542912 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5870677295366144 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Aug 8 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004901227240967072
,
Aug 8 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@407376 7588502 119283 12 good chromium@407384 7853057 39630.1 8 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Bug ID: 631055 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_mobile Test Metric: browse_news-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:web_cache:effective_size_avg/browse_news_nytimes Relative Change: 3.45% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/460 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004901227240967072 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5795346119131136 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Aug 9 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004805318136607600
,
Aug 9 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : [system-health] Tear down the browser after each story in system_health.memory_* Author : petrcermak Commit description: Rationale: Each story should be completely independent as it will allow us to compare the results from individual stories. As a result, it will be possible to compare/subtract the results from, e.g. LOAD:social:facebook and BROWSE:social:facebook. More importantly, there are literally hundreds of perf dashboard alerts each time we add a story to the SH story set. This should fix that. *** NOTE TO PERF SHERIFF *** This patch will definitely cause a lot of improvements and/or regressions in system_health.memory_desktop and system_health.memory_mobile benchmarks. This is expected. BUG=589726 CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=master.tryserver.chromium.perf:android_s5_perf_cq;master.tryserver.chromium.perf:linux_perf_cq;master.tryserver.chromium.perf:mac_retina_perf_cq;master.tryserver.chromium.perf:winx64_10_perf_cq Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2161363004 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#407380} Commit : a30a0719cdc625d240ba75054fc0de1b9f826625 Date : Sun Jul 24 12:32:33 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@407377 7544210 25610.4 5 good chromium@407379 7453196 107877 5 good chromium@407380 7849106 33221.2 5 bad <-- chromium@407381 7838292 80890.6 5 bad chromium@407384 7842762 25496.7 5 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Bug ID: 631055 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_mobile Test Metric: browse_news-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:web_cache:effective_size_avg/browse_news_nytimes Relative Change: 3.96% Score: 99.9 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/467 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004805318136607600 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5836362721263616 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Aug 30 2016
,
Aug 30 2016
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by petrcermak@chromium.org
, Jul 25 2016