Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
8.1% regression in speedometer at 406285:406306 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jul 20 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9006620907052353904
,
Jul 20 2016
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author huapengl@amazon.com === Hi huapengl@amazon.com, the bisect results pointed to your CL below as possibly causing a regression. Please have a look at this info and see whether your CL be related. ===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : Use "-Os" for Android or IOS in "optimize_max" config Author : huapengl Commit description: Using "-Os" would benefit both Android and IOS build, because "-Os" does "-O2" optimizations and code size improvement. libchrome.so drops from 44MB to 42 MB. ChromePublic.apk drops from 47 MB to 45 MB. BUG=621335 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2158053002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#406304} Commit : 2bb3c4f7a7c7632afe1b63a19d49daa61bbfc37b Date : Tue Jul 19 17:21:48 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@406284 30414.0 266.725 5 good chromium@406295 30289.2 114.994 5 good chromium@406301 30259.5 108.091 5 good chromium@406303 30374.5 105.873 5 good chromium@406304 32862.5 167.179 5 bad <-- chromium@406306 32833.9 116.793 5 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus6_perf_bisect Bug ID: 629798 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests speedometer Test Metric: Total/Total Relative Change: 7.96% Score: 99.9 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus6_perf_bisect/builds/2322 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9006620907052353904 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5763725001228288 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jul 20 2016
It looks like we should revert the CL.
,
Jul 20 2016
,
Jul 20 2016
Thanks for the revert. There was quite a bit of regressions due to this. If you are planning to land this (or something similar) please again give a heads up to perf-sheriffs@.
,
Jul 20 2016
somehow the de-duplication did not leave a comment here but here are the other duplicates issues: issue 629809, issue 629810
,
Jul 21 2016
Reverting recovered the regression.
,
Jul 21 2016
FYI this also regressed sizes. Just triaged the alerts to this bug if you want to take a look. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by ishell@chromium.org
, Jul 20 2016