Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
33.9% regression in smoothness.top_25_smooth at 405321:405396 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jul 18 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9006759115318690784
,
Jul 19 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@405320 19.9775 2.27477 8 good chromium@405396 21.6646 4.24804 11 bad Bisect job ran on: mac_hdd_perf_bisect Bug ID: 629302 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests smoothness.top_25_smooth Test Metric: mean_input_event_latency/http___www.amazon.com Relative Change: 2.21% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_hdd_perf_bisect/builds/650 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9006759115318690784 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5233519207383040 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jul 20 2016
Passing the last few on to the current perf sheriff for triage...
,
Aug 1 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005516748480645584
,
Aug 1 2016
Trying a couple of new bisects.
,
Aug 1 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@405300 21.2092 4.13619 12 good chromium@405410 20.5488 1.73432 12 bad Bisect job ran on: mac_hdd_perf_bisect Bug ID: 629302 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests smoothness.top_25_smooth Test Metric: mean_input_event_latency/http___www.amazon.com Relative Change: 6.88% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_hdd_perf_bisect/builds/689 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005516748480645584 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5228679106396160 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Aug 18 2016
Perf sheriff ping: reminder to follow up on possible performance issues
,
Oct 11 2016
Perf sheriff ping
,
Oct 17 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8998513413236566528
,
Oct 17 2016
Bisect failed: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_hdd_perf_bisect/builds/848 Failure reason: the build has failed. Additional errors: The metric was not found in the test output. Either of the initial "good" or "bad" revisions failed to be tested or built.
,
Oct 28 2016
Current numbers are far below original alert level.
,
Apr 11 2017
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/8982584673687603312 |
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by m...@chromium.org
, Jul 18 2016