Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
4.5% regression in system_health.memory_desktop at 405705:405725 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jul 18 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9006785311014819360
,
Jul 18 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@405708 2883584 0.0 12 good chromium@405718 2916352 59279.5 12 bad Bisect job ran on: linux_perf_bisect Bug ID: 629107 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_desktop Test Metric: load_social-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:blink_gc:effective_size_avg/load_social_instagram Relative Change: 0.91% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/linux_perf_bisect/builds/6597 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9006785311014819360 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=6364192232177664 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jul 19 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9006717376723704640
,
Jul 19 2016
,
Aug 15 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004250100183526336
,
Aug 15 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@405708 2894507 37837.2 12 good chromium@405725 2883584 0.0 12 bad Bisect job ran on: linux_perf_bisect Bug ID: 629107 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_desktop Test Metric: load_social-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:blink_gc:effective_size_avg/load_social_instagram Relative Change: 0.00% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/linux_perf_bisect/builds/6645 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004250100183526336 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5859330243428352 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Aug 19 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9003876158031212816
,
Aug 20 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : Make WebTraceLocation be an alias of tracked_objects::Location Author : tzik Commit description: Make WebTraceLocation be an alias of tracked_objects::Location and BLINK_FROM_HERE be an alias of FROM_HERE as well. So that tasks posted from Blink leaves a valid program counter and line number in the crash dump. Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2137013002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#405736} Commit : 3c109dd65c1984237444da93f7c7acc8b0bdcd92 Date : Fri Jul 15 09:53:07 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@405539 2883584 0.0 5 good chromium@405729 2909798 58617.2 5 good chromium@405735 2883584 0.0 5 good chromium@405736 3014656 0.0 5 bad <-- chromium@405737 3014656 0.0 5 bad chromium@405738 3014656 0.0 5 bad chromium@405741 3014656 0.0 5 bad chromium@405753 3014656 0.0 5 bad chromium@405777 3014656 0.0 5 bad chromium@405824 3014656 0.0 5 bad chromium@405918 3014656 0.0 5 bad Bisect job ran on: mac_10_10_perf_bisect Bug ID: 629107 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_desktop Test Metric: load_social-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:blink_gc:effective_size_avg/load_social_instagram Relative Change: 4.55% Score: 99.9 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_10_10_perf_bisect/builds/2318 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9003876158031212816 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5325480102723584 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Aug 30 2016
,
Aug 30 2016
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by petrcermak@chromium.org
, Jul 18 2016