Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
4.2%-7.4% regression in system_health.memory_desktop at 405475:405497 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jul 18 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9006785407780445904
,
Jul 18 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@405481 28914550 854171 12 good chromium@405494 29417472 774425 12 bad Bisect job ran on: mac_10_10_perf_bisect Bug ID: 629106 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_desktop Test Metric: load_media-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/load_media_youtube Relative Change: 0.72% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_10_10_perf_bisect/builds/2212 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9006785407780445904 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5901929935273984 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jul 19 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9006717506372001968
,
Jul 19 2016
,
Aug 5 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9005150975234166272
,
Aug 15 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004244413719617744
,
Aug 15 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@405481 28980565 539942 12 good chromium@405513 29504853 302698 12 bad Bisect job ran on: mac_10_10_perf_bisect Bug ID: 629106 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_desktop Test Metric: load_media-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_avg/load_media_youtube Relative Change: 1.45% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_10_10_perf_bisect/builds/2297 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004244413719617744 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5870987589976064 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Aug 19 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9003876490062368128
,
Aug 30 2016
,
Aug 30 2016
,
Sep 16 2016
Temporarily declaring bankruptcy on the *desktop* system health benchmark. The number of alerts became unmanageable and the overall process needs to be improved to make it sustainable. The alerts have been turned off and I'm archiving the outstanding regressions. Note: this is just about desktop, the mobile system health stays up. |
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by petrcermak@chromium.org
, Jul 18 2016