Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
1.4%-8250% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 405742:405758 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Aug 15 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004250402599773136
,
Aug 15 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : Revert of Re-enable GPU Rasterization for content with any author defined viewport. (patchset #2 id:20001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2097413003/ ) Author : picksi Commit description: Reason for revert: This has caused an unexpectedly large regression in overall PSS (about 5MB, graph here: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/report?sid=0b072725c25637efb0d3a44383da1e24e42bbb3740a00505e4040af2173423b0&start_rev=402061&end_rev=402790). The owners are both OOO and this is blocking Android release. This has already been reverted in the release branch but our infrastructure cannot gather data from the branch to confirm that the revert has had the intended result. This revert will allow us to confirm that this CL was the cause of the regression. Once confirmed (or otherwise) via telemetry dashboards this revert will be re-reverted. Original issue's description: > Re-enable GPU Rasterization for content with any author defined viewport. > > BUG= 591179 > > Committed: https://crrev.com/a017b667a53b3ee5f8bc630be98c37ebf53a2339 > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#402702} TBR=aelias@chromium.org,chrishtr@chromium.org,vmiura@chromium.org # Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed more than 1 days ago. BUG= 591179 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2156553002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#405750} Commit : 10a77702aa0490dfaaa6e354151b24b738474fb4 Date : Fri Jul 15 13:13:14 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@405745 26233108 0.0 5 good chromium@405749 26233108 0.0 5 good chromium@405750 31065144 0.0 5 bad <-- chromium@405751 31065144 0.0 5 bad chromium@405752 31065144 0.0 5 bad chromium@405758 31065144 0.0 5 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus6_perf_bisect Bug ID: 629100 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_mobile Test Metric: load_news-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:gpu:effective_size_avg/load_news_reddit Relative Change: 18.42% Score: 99.9 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus6_perf_bisect/builds/2466 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004250402599773136 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5819277123256320 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Aug 30 2016
,
Aug 30 2016
|
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by petrcermak@chromium.org
, Aug 15 2016