Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
2.1% regression in system_health.memory_mobile at 405156:405201 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jul 15 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9007060420155055008
,
Jul 15 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@405155 22915072 3418962 12 good chromium@405201 22043648 131378 8 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus7_perf_bisect Bug ID: 628638 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_mobile Test Metric: load_news-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_os:gpu_memory:gl:proportional_resident_size_avg/load_news_qq Relative Change: 1.56% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus7_perf_bisect/builds/3079 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9007060420155055008 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5802908591849472 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jul 18 2016
,
Jul 18 2016
Petr: That looks like a bisect on mac for bug 628268 . Did you kick off a bisect for this bug too? The dashboard should be updating the bug with the bisect link now (as it did for the other bug)
,
Jul 18 2016
Annie: You're right. I'm pretty sure that this regression is just bug 628268 shifted on build forward due to noise (see the screenshot).
,
Aug 30 2016
,
Aug 30 2016
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by petrcermak@chromium.org
, Jul 15 2016