Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
16.3%-169.5% regression in system_health.memory_desktop at 404483:404911 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jul 14 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9007143262679835808
,
Jul 14 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@404580 71050105 492491 12 good chromium@404721 71157883 321683 12 bad Bisect job ran on: win_8_perf_bisect Bug ID: 628289 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_desktop Test Metric: load_media-memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:winheap:effective_size_avg/load_media_soundcloud Relative Change: 0.42% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_8_perf_bisect/builds/2035 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9007143262679835808 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5861609386278912 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jul 15 2016
,
Jul 15 2016
,
Aug 30 2016
,
Aug 30 2016
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by petrcermak@chromium.org
, Jul 14 2016