Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
Crash in SkPixelRef::SkPixelRef |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionDetailed report: https://cluster-fuzz.appspot.com/testcase?key=6106013157818368 Fuzzer: sugoi_filter_fuzzer Job Type: linux_asan_filter_fuzz_stub_32bit Platform Id: linux Crash Type: UNKNOWN WRITE Crash Address: 0x00000004 Crash State: SkPixelRef::SkPixelRef SkMallocPixelRef::NewAllocate SkMallocPixelRef::PRFactory::create Regressed: https://cluster-fuzz.appspot.com/revisions?job=linux_asan_filter_fuzz_stub_32bit&range=344473:344607 Minimized Testcase (0.30 Kb): https://cluster-fuzz.appspot.com/download/AMIfv95izSHXzX6ievRBq4kRsUZNSc18ossarmH2IVWYtirGAj5XgQypBkKl3Hcd9DCGtRXHdLeTWkDL9udkWDP427oL84iF6AmaiX7-ws16oMTnYARp88bj0oxbbJCZ6X0WkkPuf0QCzLU1SzgTbumjlNIytf_ozA?testcase_id=6106013157818368 Filer: nyerramilli See https://dev.chromium.org/Home/chromium-security/bugs/reproducing-clusterfuzz-bugs for more information.
,
Jul 11 2016
,
Jul 11 2016
,
Jul 11 2016
,
Jul 11 2016
Agreed. Definitely looks like new isn't failing immediately. Just in case this comes up, the problem does _not_ appear to be the non-throwing malloc call we made just before this... it's the new for the small pixel-ref struct managing that memory.
,
Jul 13 2016
,
Aug 24 2016
ClusterFuzz has detected this issue as fixed in range 413737:413791. Detailed report: https://cluster-fuzz.appspot.com/testcase?key=6106013157818368 Fuzzer: sugoi_filter_fuzzer Job Type: linux_asan_filter_fuzz_stub_32bit Platform Id: linux Crash Type: UNKNOWN WRITE Crash Address: 0x00000004 Crash State: SkPixelRef::SkPixelRef SkMallocPixelRef::NewAllocate SkMallocPixelRef::PRFactory::create Regressed: https://cluster-fuzz.appspot.com/revisions?job=linux_asan_filter_fuzz_stub_32bit&range=344473:344607 Fixed: https://cluster-fuzz.appspot.com/revisions?job=linux_asan_filter_fuzz_stub_32bit&range=413737:413791 Minimized Testcase (0.30 Kb): https://cluster-fuzz.appspot.com/download/AMIfv95izSHXzX6ievRBq4kRsUZNSc18ossarmH2IVWYtirGAj5XgQypBkKl3Hcd9DCGtRXHdLeTWkDL9udkWDP427oL84iF6AmaiX7-ws16oMTnYARp88bj0oxbbJCZ6X0WkkPuf0QCzLU1SzgTbumjlNIytf_ozA?testcase_id=6106013157818368 See https://dev.chromium.org/Home/chromium-security/bugs/reproducing-clusterfuzz-bugs for more information. If you suspect that the result above is incorrect, try re-doing that job on the test case report page.
,
Oct 18 2016
,
Nov 22 2016
Removing EditIssue view restrictions from ClusterFuzz filed bugs. If you believe that this issue should still be restricted, please reapply the label. For more details visit https://www.chromium.org/issue-tracking/autotriage - Your friendly Sheriffbot |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by nyerramilli@chromium.org
, Jul 11 2016Components: Tools>Test>FindIt>WrongResult
Labels: findit-wrong Te-Logged M-52
Owner: reed@chromium.org
Status: Assigned (was: Available)