Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
4667% regression in memory.blink_memory_mobile at 403881:403889 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jul 8 2016
Probably https://codereview.chromium.org/2123653005 ? Cc-ing drott@ It seems that Pinterest is affected much. https://chromeperf.appspot.com/report?sid=fe3343a6097fd5a14df1a5f437059fa3e48660ccb24bf575ca9e903611ce28fb
,
Jul 8 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : Activate complex text path on Android Author : drott Commit description: In Chromium commit 10749067720a341 catapult was rolled, switching to default teardowns between pageset repeats, compare [1]. Activating complex text on Android again after this change in order to see how measurements are affected by this. If no memory regression shows up in the memory health measurements for memory pagesets this would indicate that we may have a memory-leakage over time problem in webview single-process mode but no issues in the usual tab process lifecycle on Android. Activating and TBR'ing to collect bot results, potentially reverting later if needed for further investigation. [1] https://github.com/catapult-project/catapult/issues/2294 BUG=577306 TBR=eae Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2123653005 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#403884} Commit : 5009e3effbb04c74140d262fb71bc51cbf38913a Date : Wed Jul 06 11:39:32 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@403880 1485.6 8.76356 5 good chromium@403883 1484.8 16.0997 5 good chromium@403884 92345.6 118.802 5 bad <-- chromium@403885 92310.2 254.513 5 bad chromium@403889 92426.4 99.6534 5 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5X_perf_bisect Bug ID: 626516 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests memory.blink_memory_mobile Test Metric: memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:font_caches:effective_size_avg/memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:font_caches:effective_size_avg Relative Change: 6121.49% Score: 99.9 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5X_perf_bisect/builds/308 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9007748833708237360 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5880131382411264 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jul 18 2016
This effect can be likely marked as WontFix since the value is only used in the complex font path and we don't have equivalent memory reporting in the simple path. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by bashi@chromium.org
, Jul 8 2016