Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
14.3%-144% regression in blink_perf.paint at 403611:403611 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jul 5 2016
Regression appears to be somewhere inside this v8 roll: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/02f7f5836dab4f3d269618f9b699f7555221d9b0
,
Jul 7 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@403610 11.5628 0.24403 5 good chromium@403610,v8@b1063f7a41 11.8258 0.421942 5 good chromium@403610,v8@6f920d7d59 11.799 0.292271 5 good chromium@403610,v8@5927deaaf1 11.6554 0.20612 5 good chromium@403610,v8@317dc0578f 11.642 0.158832 5 good chromium@403610,v8@486d181928 11.572 0.111191 5 good chromium@403610,v8@de5beb45b8 11.924 0.194636 5 good chromium@403611 28.7358 0.523173 5 bad Bisect job ran on: linux_perf_bisect Bug ID: 625895 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.bindings Test Metric: serialize-nested-array/serialize-nested-array Relative Change: 148.52% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/linux_perf_bisect/builds/6576 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9007832620493099248 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5870405764513792 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jul 7 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@403610 11.5116 0.116141 5 good chromium@403610,v8@b1063f7a41 11.6016 0.182612 5 good chromium@403610,v8@6f920d7d59 11.7152 0.386777 5 good chromium@403610,v8@5927deaaf1 11.8978 0.216796 5 good chromium@403610,v8@317dc0578f 11.8132 0.298088 5 good chromium@403610,v8@486d181928 11.536 0.157002 5 good chromium@403610,v8@de5beb45b8 11.4994 0.142012 5 good chromium@403611 28.5226 0.0687699 5 bad Bisect job ran on: linux_perf_bisect Bug ID: 625895 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests blink_perf.bindings Test Metric: serialize-nested-array/serialize-nested-array Relative Change: 147.77% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/linux_perf_bisect/builds/6579 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9007781129927069328 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5780619473190912 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jul 8 2016
Do not worry about regressions on serialize-nested-array benchmark. This test is not serious one. |
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by qyears...@chromium.org
, Jul 5 2016