Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
476.1%-586.9% regression in top_10_mobile_memory at 401805:401842 |
||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jul 3 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@401804 22649602 1577856 18 good chromium@401842 23098327 766873 14 bad Bisect job ran on: win_perf_bisect Bug ID: 625433 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests top_10_mobile_memory Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_max/http___m.youtube.com_results?q_science Relative Change: 3.33% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_perf_bisect/builds/6640 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9008203586208626896 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5810380643762176 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jul 3 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@401804 23034270 1579726 15 good chromium@401842 22371493 2447582 17 bad Bisect job ran on: win_perf_bisect Bug ID: 625433 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests top_10_mobile_memory Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:effective_size_max/http___m.youtube.com_results?q_science Relative Change: 1.83% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_perf_bisect/builds/6642 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9008187372876177120 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5313263949053952 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jul 3 2016
Moving this nonessential bug to the next milestone. For more details visit https://www.chromium.org/issue-tracking/autotriage - Your friendly Sheriffbot
,
Jul 3 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@401804 7912237 217243 14 good chromium@401842 7910161 161444 14 bad Bisect job ran on: win_perf_bisect Bug ID: 625433 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests top_10_mobile_memory Test Metric: memory:chrome:all_processes:reported_by_chrome:v8:allocated_objects_size_max/http___m.youtube.com_results?q_science Relative Change: 3.24% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_perf_bisect/builds/6647 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9008140184037873744 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5874036219838464 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jul 7 2016
Bisect failed to reproduce, no ref build results. |
|||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by qyears...@chromium.org
, Jul 3 2016