22.6 → 24.4 MiB regression in memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:cc:effective_size_avg on system_health.memory_mobile/load:social:pinterest |
|||||||
Issue description
,
Jun 29 2016
,
Jun 30 2016
Good news: The bisect reproduced the issue :-) Bad news: The bisect failed shortly afterwards :-( I'll try to start another one...
,
Jun 30 2016
The second bisect failed for the exact same reason. I guess there's nothing we can do but wait for issue 624734 to be fixed.
,
Jun 30 2016
Issue 624734 should be fixed now, so her's another one: https://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/3790
,
Jul 1 2016
,
Jul 11 2016
It seems that issue 604021 has been fixed (although it hasn't been marked as such), so here's another bisect: https://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/3817
,
Jul 12 2016
It turns out that we're still blocked on issue 604021 :-(
,
Aug 15 2016
Started bisect job https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004253360962262560
,
Aug 15 2016
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author vmiura@chromium.org === Hi vmiura@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL below as possibly causing a regression. Please have a look at this info and see whether your CL be related. ===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : Re-enable GPU Rasterization for content with any author defined viewport. Author : vmiura Commit description: BUG= 591179 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2097413003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#402702} Commit : a017b667a53b3ee5f8bc630be98c37ebf53a2339 Date : Wed Jun 29 03:37:05 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@402670 23699456 0.0 5 good chromium@402693 23699456 0.0 5 good chromium@402699 23699456 0.0 5 good chromium@402701 23699456 0.0 5 good chromium@402702 25614064 0.0 5 bad <-- chromium@402704 25614064 0.0 5 bad chromium@402715 25614064 0.0 5 bad Bisect job ran on: android_nexus5_perf_bisect Bug ID: 624518 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests system_health.memory_mobile Test Metric: load_social-memory:chrome:renderer_processes:reported_by_chrome:cc:effective_size_avg/load_social_pinterest Relative Change: 8.08% Score: 99.9 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_nexus5_perf_bisect/builds/3991 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9004253360962262560 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5885222453772288 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Aug 30 2016
,
May 10 2017
This has since recovered to 20,761,500 bytes. |
|||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||
Comment 1 by petrcermak@chromium.org
, Jun 29 2016