New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 623833 link

Starred by 2 users

Issue metadata

Status: WontFix
Owner:
Closed: Jul 2016
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

11.8% regression in smoothness.tough_filters_cases at 401742:401756

Project Member Reported by lanwei@google.com, Jun 28 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 1 by lanwei@google.com, Jun 28 2016

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=623833

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgopHsswoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

linux-release
Project Member

Comment 2 by 42576172...@developer.gserviceaccount.com, Jun 28 2016


===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@401741  51.0939  1.75926  18  good
chromium@401756  52.0138  2.44174  18  bad

Bisect job ran on: linux_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 623833

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests smoothness.tough_filters_cases
Test Metric: frame_times/http___rawgit.com_WebKit_webkit_master_PerformanceTests_Animometer_developer.html?test-interval_20_display_minimal_controller_fixed_frame-rate_50_kalman-process-error_1_kalman-measurement-error_4_time-measurement_performance_suite-name_Animometer_test-name_Focus_complexity_100
Relative Change: 2.55%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/linux_perf_bisect/builds/6554
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9008648049325553712


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5827398277267456

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!
Project Member

Comment 3 by sheriffbot@chromium.org, Jun 28 2016

Labels: Hotlist-Google
Project Member

Comment 4 by sheriffbot@chromium.org, Jul 2 2016

Labels: -M-53 M-54 MovedFrom-53
Moving this nonessential bug to the next milestone.

For more details visit https://www.chromium.org/issue-tracking/autotriage - Your friendly Sheriffbot
Lan, can you follow up on this?

From the instructions (https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/tools/perf/docs/perf_regression_sheriffing.md):
"After your shift, please try to follow up on the bugs you filed weekly. Kick off new bisects if the previous ones failed, and if the bisect picks a likely culprit follow up to ensure the CL author addresses the problem. If you are certain that a specific CL caused a performance regression, and the author does not have an immediate plan to address the problem, please revert the CL."

Comment 6 by lanwei@chromium.org, Jul 22 2016

Status: WontFix (was: Assigned)
This is recovered.

Sign in to add a comment