Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
4.9% regression in thread_times.tough_scrolling_cases at 401779:401800 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jun 28 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : Turn on enable begin frame scheduling by default Author : enne Commit description: This turns on --enable-begin-frame-scheduling[1] for all[2] platforms. This was already on for Android so should only be a real change for desktop / ChromeOS platforms. Lots of cleanup can follow from this like removing all commit vsync / authoritative vsync / CompositorVSyncManager things, but this is a smaller patch to suss out any performance regressions. [1] In this case, "begin frame scheduling" means browser->renderer begin frame ticks instead of sending vsync information and having a synthetic source on the renderer side. [2] MUS is not hooked up to begin frame scheduling yet, but mojo:mash_session in an "oxygen" build still works with this patch applied. Blimp also doesn't use begin frame scheduling and will eventually just be transitioned to a synthetic begin frame source for its engine half. CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.blink:linux_blink_rel Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1939253002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#401796} Commit : f2d7f5e1891703ec4384ededd80f896816921204 Date : Fri Jun 24 02:43:08 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@401778 11.2087 0.091002 5 good chromium@401789 11.1926 0.132928 5 good chromium@401795 11.2662 0.0504048 5 good chromium@401796 10.6505 0.0312014 5 bad <-- chromium@401797 10.608 0.073696 5 bad chromium@401798 10.6243 0.0734469 5 bad chromium@401800 10.61 0.0387716 5 bad Bisect job ran on: mac_10_11_perf_bisect Bug ID: 623828 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests thread_times.tough_scrolling_cases Test Metric: thread_total_all_cpu_time_per_frame/thread_total_all_cpu_time_per_frame Relative Change: 5.34% Score: 99.9 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/mac_10_11_perf_bisect/builds/698 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9008648411808434368 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5838228305739776 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you! |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by lanwei@google.com
, Jun 28 2016