New issue
Advanced search Search tips

Issue 623825 link

Starred by 2 users

Issue metadata

Status: Duplicate
Merged: issue 623826
Owner:
Closed: Jul 2016
EstimatedDays: ----
NextAction: ----
OS: ----
Pri: 2
Type: Bug-Regression



Sign in to add a comment

27.3%-27.9% regression in blink_perf.bindings at 401962:402005

Project Member Reported by lanwei@google.com, Jun 28 2016

Issue description

See the link to graphs below.
 

Comment 1 by lanwei@google.com, Jun 28 2016

All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=623825

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgouKJuAoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgwtmarwsM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win7-x64-dual
chromium-rel-win8-dual
Project Member

Comment 2 by sheriffbot@chromium.org, Jun 28 2016

Labels: Hotlist-Google
Project Member

Comment 3 by sheriffbot@chromium.org, Jul 2 2016

Labels: -M-53 M-54 MovedFrom-53
Moving this nonessential bug to the next milestone.

For more details visit https://www.chromium.org/issue-tracking/autotriage - Your friendly Sheriffbot
Lan, can you follow up on this?

From the instructions (https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/tools/perf/docs/perf_regression_sheriffing.md):
"After your shift, please try to follow up on the bugs you filed weekly. Kick off new bisects if the previous ones failed, and if the bisect picks a likely culprit follow up to ensure the CL author addresses the problem. If you are certain that a specific CL caused a performance regression, and the author does not have an immediate plan to address the problem, please revert the CL."
Mergedinto: 623826
Status: Duplicate (was: Assigned)

Sign in to add a comment