All graphs for this bug:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?bug_id=623652

Original alerts at time of bug-filing:
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/group_report?keys=agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgoua9tgsM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgorLurAoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgor2jvAoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgopvzuAoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICg4vCVuQoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICg4vScswoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgooLarwkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgoqj_qQoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgoqj_qQkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgorGBowkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgooqDtAoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgwrfo8wgM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgou2JqAoM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgoqSFpAsM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgou3tuQkM,agxzfmNocm9tZXBlcmZyFAsSB0Fub21hbHkYgICgosOsvQoM


Bot(s) for this bug's original alert(s):

chromium-rel-win10
chromium-rel-win7-dual
chromium-rel-win7-gpu-ati
chromium-rel-win7-gpu-intel
chromium-rel-win7-gpu-nvidia
chromium-rel-win7-x64-dual
chromium-rel-win8-dual

===== BISECT JOB RESULTS =====
Status: completed


=== Bisection aborted ===
The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression.
Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error.

=== Warnings ===
The following warnings were raised by the bisect job:

 * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence.

===== TESTED REVISIONS =====
Revision         Mean     Std Dev  N   Good?
chromium@402005  96.1255  9.55184  8   good
chromium@402030  98.7536  9.56936  11  bad

Bisect job ran on: win_x64_perf_bisect
Bug ID: 623652

Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=release_x64 --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests smoothness.top_25_smooth
Test Metric: mean_input_event_latency/ESPN
Relative Change: 3.71%
Score: 0

Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/win_x64_perf_bisect/builds/1271
Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9008676522339646048


Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you!
  https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5790481556963328

| O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq
|  X  | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback,
| / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect.  Thank you!

Moving this nonessential bug to the next milestone.

For more details visit https://www.chromium.org/issue-tracking/autotriage - Your friendly Sheriffbot

Lan, can you follow up on this?

From the instructions (https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/tools/perf/docs/perf_regression_sheriffing.md):
"After your shift, please try to follow up on the bugs you filed weekly. Kick off new bisects if the previous ones failed, and if the bisect picks a likely culprit follow up to ensure the CL author addresses the problem. If you are certain that a specific CL caused a performance regression, and the author does not have an immediate plan to address the problem, please revert the CL."

The regression is recovered.