Issue metadata
Sign in to add a comment
|
5.6% regression in thread_times.simple_mobile_sites at 400030:400065 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Issue descriptionSee the link to graphs below.
,
Jun 21 2016
===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed === Bisection aborted === The bisect was aborted because The metric values for the initial "good" and "bad" revisions do not represent a clear regression. Please contact the the team (see below) if you believe this is in error. === Warnings === The following warnings were raised by the bisect job: * Bisect failed to reproduce the regression with enough confidence. ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@400029 4.47221 0.0296019 18 good chromium@400065 4.48357 0.0409238 18 bad Bisect job ran on: android_s5_perf_bisect Bug ID: 621803 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests thread_times.simple_mobile_sites Test Metric: thread_IO_cpu_time_per_frame/thread_IO_cpu_time_per_frame Relative Change: 0.84% Score: 0 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_s5_perf_bisect/builds/727 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9009265962536450736 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5793774924464128 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jun 21 2016
=== Auto-CCing suspected CL author rockot@chromium.org === Hi rockot@chromium.org, the bisect results pointed to your CL below as possibly causing a regression. Please have a look at this info and see whether your CL be related. ===== BISECT JOB RESULTS ===== Status: completed ===== SUSPECTED CL(s) ===== Subject : Revert "Send input event IPCs directly from the UI thread" Author : rockot Commit description: This reverts commit 868f89e764ab0e807adb237f0cbaf79ca5f49257. See https://codereview.chromium.org/1991323002 for the original CL. Per offline discussions: there was no clear benefit from using SendNow for input events, and having the extra interface adds unnecessary complexity given that nobody is going to work on porting Send call sites. BUG= 612944 R=jam@chromium.org Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2068343003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#400227} Commit : f14a8ae8f52b814820b29752996c5cee903a8d4d Date : Thu Jun 16 19:30:22 2016 ===== TESTED REVISIONS ===== Revision Mean Std Dev N Good? chromium@399544 4.36223 0.106451 5 good chromium@399886 4.48111 0.00951618 5 good chromium@400057 4.52717 0.0371753 5 good chromium@400142 4.54843 0.0207563 5 good chromium@400185 4.52734 0.0161809 5 good chromium@400206 4.53735 0.032758 8 good chromium@400217 4.54678 0.0594961 8 good chromium@400222 4.52863 0.0542443 8 good chromium@400225 4.54072 0.0838837 8 good chromium@400226 4.50345 0.0291675 5 good chromium@400227 4.6866 0.0315838 8 bad <-- Bisect job ran on: android_s5_perf_bisect Bug ID: 621803 Test Command: src/tools/perf/run_benchmark -v --browser=android-chromium --output-format=chartjson --upload-results --also-run-disabled-tests thread_times.simple_mobile_sites Test Metric: thread_IO_cpu_time_per_frame/thread_IO_cpu_time_per_frame Relative Change: 7.22% Score: 99.8 Buildbot stdio: http://build.chromium.org/p/tryserver.chromium.perf/builders/android_s5_perf_bisect/builds/728 Job details: https://chromeperf.appspot.com/buildbucket_job_status/9009265930191277360 Not what you expected? We'll investigate and get back to you! https://chromeperf.appspot.com/bad_bisect?try_job_id=5328465952243712 | O O | Visit http://www.chromium.org/developers/speed-infra/perf-bug-faq | X | for more information addressing perf regression bugs. For feedback, | / \ | file a bug with component Tests>AutoBisect. Thank you!
,
Jun 21 2016
This should be expected. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
►
Sign in to add a comment |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Comment 1 by toyoshim@chromium.org
, Jun 21 2016